• News/Talk
  • Music
  • Entertainment

Marketplace

The Greenwash Brigade

Google is to Spider-Man as ... ?

Dennis Markatos-Soriano's take

In Spider-Man, Uncle Ben warns Peter Parker, "with great power comes great responsibility."

Google is one of the most profitable companies in the world with a market capitalization above $200 billion, and its founders and CEO are three of the richest people in the world. Add to that their leading position in the growing online ad and search markets, and they definitely qualify as having "great power." If Google follows through on its latest announcement to bring the price of renewables below that of coal then the spirit of Spider-Man will be alive and well.

Google.org, their philanthropic arm, plans to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to support research on solar thermal, wind, and other renewable technologies. And it doesn't look like greenwash to me because this act is consistent with other recent initiatives:

1. Google.org provided funding for a national student climate conference that brought more than 5,000 young people to D.C. in early November to strategize for clean energy revolutions on their campuses and push Congress to legislate an 80% cut in emissions by 2050.

2. Google is committed to be climate neutral by the end of the year, joining HSBC, Yahoo!, and others. Toward their goal, Google installed 1.6 MW of solar PV on their buildings this year, the largest corporate installation to date.

Is PR involved? Sure. But these moves can help steer energy markets in the right direction. Cheap, clean energy would be good for Google, and it's necessary for the health of the Earth.

Coal is arguably the key driver of global warming, as its carbon dioxide emissions per Btu of energy are 17% higher than those from oil and 44% higher than those from natural gas. And there are many other pollutants that hurt our air and water quality when we burn coal -- from the neurotoxin mercury to the sulfur dioxide that produces acid rain. Coal's abundance makes it the cheapest fossil fuel to rely on into the future, while the supply of oil is already at a plateau and natural gas may follow within a decade or two. This cheapness makes coal the fuel of choice for rapidly growing economies such as China, which probably passed the U.S. as the largest emitter nation of greenhouse gases this year. So, to prevent dangerous climate change, renewables have to not only be affordable to the richer countries of the world but also to developing countries.

Google picked a good time to focus on competing with coal. Its trading price is breaking records globally at more than $85 per metric ton and UBS predicted this week that continued demand growth in Asia will lift prices to further records above $100 in 2008 and 2009.

The twin challenges of skyrocketing energy prices and climate change can be tackled if Google's fell swoop is successful. But this is no easy task. Researchers have been developing wind turbines, solar panels, and biofuels for decades to achieve this goal, and while progress has been made, coal is still vastly cheaper. But if anyone can stand on the shoulders of millions of giants from the past and present, sort that information out, and produce a product that billions of people can enjoy — it's hard to argue that Google isn't a great candidate for the job.

I am hopeful that Google can help be like Spidey to achieve the sustainable energy transition our world needs.

PS: (I don't own Google stock, though I wish I did.)

Heidi Siegelbaum responds:

I can't think of one critical thing to say about Google's news - absolutely nothing!

Google is also stemming the tide against coal subsidies and may tip the balance in favor of renewable energy investments. On the policy side, lowering subsidies for coal would help: according to a recent GAO report, less than a fifth of federal energy R&D and tax expenditures go toward renewables, with the vast majority supporting fossil fuels and nuclear.

Google's detractors seem to believe that corporations operate in some vacuum... where have all the CSR flowers gone? There are more than 2,600 grantmaking (opens PDF) corporate foundations in the U.S., and inventive ones like Google are diversifying into new areas responsive to stakeholders' needs while wildly prospering. When did a corporation's foundation have to strictly mimic its lines of business?

A recently released report (opens PDF) on Corporate Design (or really, redesign) makes an interesting point that companies that have adaptive cultures and effectively serve the needs of their stakeholders outperform their peers on every count: growth in revenue, employment, stock price and net income. Google is serving its stakeholders by making this impressive investment in renewable energy. Who are a corporation's stakeholders? In this case, nearly every person attached to the fingers using a Google search function, the communities in which they operate their servers, Mountainview, CA, and all our children just to name a few. This is a solid piece of cerebral cortex with a soul, not solid image work.

Jim Nicolow responds:

This is a huge deal. If Google can successfully produce one gigawatt of renewable energy cheaper than coal it really will move the market. One gigawatt is equivalent to the output of a new coal power plant. To an architect accustomed to looking at renewable energy projects at the scale of individual buildings, measured in kilowatts (1/1,000,000 of a gigawatt), this is a significant undertaking by Google and worthy of praise.

Sure there's a PR angle to it. So what. With an informed populace, doing the right thing should make for good public relations. There is most certainly a business angle as well. The writing is on the wall. As Dennis points out, the price for fossil fuel energy continues to rise, while the price for renewable energy continues to fall. Those cost curves will cross. When a carbon tax or cap and trade system inevitably comes to the U.S., those cost curves could cross overnight, making renewable energy cheaper than coal from day one, as it should be.

But you don't need to be Google to support the transition to renewable energy. For instance, our practice partnered with Carbonfund.org this year to offset 100% of our electricity use and travel emissions.

Janne K. Flisrand responds:

Google's an old hand with green initiatives, and they aren't limited to giant PR activities.

On the corporate side, Google walks the sustainability talk as only a huge company can. They provide commuter buses to employees working in their Silicon Valley headquarters — with nearly one quarter of their workforce using them. Google builds its own energy-efficient servers. They installed the "largest single corporate solar installation in the world" to power their campus. Their campus food service serves healthy, organic food, and the chef at Cafe 150, one of their cafeterias, is a "passionate proponent of local, organic and sustainable food" using exclusively ingredients from within 150 miles. The Google Store stocks eco-gear. The list goes on.

Google employees are encouraged to work on their own projects, which often turn into public applications. A number of them have a green bent. There is Google Transit, which integrates the schedules and maps of different regional transit services. There's also a green map mash-up for vacation planners.

This culture pervades the company. Reading more about it, now I want to work for Google. Oh wait... maybe Google's HR has a hand in this...

Comments (4)

Allen | Respond
December 3, 2007 6:50 PM PT

Note that while google is installing solar panels they're still counting on the grid to provide them with a CONSISTANT source of energy. It's nice they're doing what they are but can we really say they're "climate neutral" if they're still relying on burning a lot of coal & natural gas to ensure that at 6am or 8pm all those servers still have juice?

And surely 1.6MW isn't actually enough to make use of all their energy needs. What else are they doing for off-sets? Paying to have people grow trees?

At what date does Google have to expand these "climate neutral" measures to keep up with their still cheetah-like growth rate?

Janne | Respond
December 6, 2007 5:41 AM PT

We need to hold Google to a standard of "perfection." Google has a coherent vision for its own sustainability and a plan to continuously improve how it's doing compared with that vision.

For example, they are working to reduce their energy consumption and increase their renewable energy generation, and buy carbon offsets (dunno whether it's trees or other less controversial offsets) for the remainder.

Over time, as corporate sustainability becomes more common and more tested, we will hold companies to higher standards. For the time being, I think it's important to recognize when companies take significant steps, and Google is leading the pack.

Allen | Respond
December 13, 2007 8:56 PM PT

IIRC a bottled water company recently took heat because they were saying they were carbon neutral but they weren't including the CO2 the trucks were spewing in their deliveries. Does Google do enough to offset all the power that is needed to deliver it's search results or Gmail? That is, everything that is outside of their network short of poowering the consumer's computer?

Jim | Respond
December 17, 2007 7:07 AM PT

Nice post, Janne. The recruiting/retention angle should not be underestimated. That's been a big motivator for college & university green projects (attracting and retaining the best researchers by creating healthy green research buildings), and I'm sure it plays in the private sector as well. There is a shortage of skilled employees and surveys show growing support for sustainability among the U.S. public.

For instance, a recent Monstertrak survey found that 92% of young workers would choose to work for an environmentally friendly company: http://www.wbcsd.org/plugins/DocSearch/details.asp?type=DocDet&ObjectId=MjY1OTY


Post a comment


Comment preview will appear below.
If responding to another comment, your comment will appear below the original comment when it's published.

The following HTML tags are allowed in your comments:
+ Bold: <b>Text</b>
+ Italic: <i>Text</i>
+ Link: <a href="http://url" target="_blank">Link</a>

Tools

Meet the Greenwash Brigade

Our hand-picked environmental professionals, each part of the Public Insight Network, are on the hunt for "greenwash" as they examine eco-friendly claims by companies, governments and other groups. They ask tough questions about the mainstreaming of green, from the perspectives of people in the trenches who are focused on these issues 24/7.

Jim Nicolow

Jim Nicolow is a nationally recognized expert on sustainable design and leads the sustainability initiative for Lord, Aeck & Sargent, overseeing the incorporation of sustainable design strategies and features into the firm’s design projects. He is a LEED® Accredited Professional with extensive knowledge of the U.S. Green Building Council’s (USGBC) LEED rating system.

Janne K. Flisrand

Janne K. Flisrand has worked as an affordable housing and urban planning research consultant for five years, primarily supporting local non-profits. Her focus is on transit, transit-oriented design, affordable housing, and sustainability. Currently, she’s the program coordinator for Minnesota Green Communities, a program promoting affordable, healthy, sustainably built housing throughout Minnesota.

Dennis Markatos-Soriano

Dennis Markatos-Soriano recently completed a Master's in Public Affairs at Princeton's Woodrow Wilson School. He is now launching Sustainable Energy Transition (SET) to help individuals and institutions move from dependence on oil and gas to an efficient use of renewables. Previously, he co-founded SURGE (Students United for a Responsible Global Environment), which aims to bring young progressives together across issues of environmental and social justice throughout North Carolina and beyond. In the summer of 2006, he helped to start a small green company, Greenway Pedicabs, to provide a greenhouse gas-free transportation option for people in the Triangle of North Carolina.

Heidi Siegelbaum

Heidi Siegelbaum is a principal with Calyx Sustainable Tourism and works primarily on advancing sustainable tourism practices. She also specializes in science translation, cross-border indicators with Canada, cross-disciplinary planning and environmental technical assistance to businesses. Previously, she was in-house legal counsel for EPA for industrial chemicals and biotechnology and the senior performance measure analyst with the Washington State Department of Ecology. She is on the technical advisory committee of the Seattle Culinary Academy and a long standing member of the Chefs Collaborative.

NOTE: The opinions expressed by the Greenwash Brigade bloggers and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect the opinions of American Public Media or its employees. American Public Media is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the Greenwash Brigade bloggers.

Tags

 ©2007 American Public Media