• News/Talk
  • Music
  • Entertainment

Marketplace

Tess' Trash Challenge

My Bag, Jr.

trash_talk_9.jpg

The big, stinky bag is gone, but I've been trash-free ever since.

Victory!

A day without garbage. I brought all my recyclables home from the office with me yesterday. And we had takeout last night with (I think) recyclable packaging. So the little plastic (yes, plastic) garbage bag is still empty. We'll see if I can keep that up for another 72 hours.

My personal observations the last few days have really turned to the recycling end of all this. I mentioned in an earlier posting that maybe we should follow the Toronto model of having a "Green Bin" that holds all food waste and takes it to a massive compost heap. Well Beth Terry says they have that in Oakland. (San Fran does, too.)

Why don't we have it in Pasadena? At the same time, she can't recycle any plastic that's black. In Pasadena, far as I know, we can. That's just silly. Maybe she could ship me her black plastic and I could send her my food waste. Then, of course, we'd be generating more carbon emissions. By the way Beth has a great rundown of things to watch for when you're tossing stuff into the recycling bin. Check it out.

And here's something I knew in the back of my brain, but is still depressing: All that recycling I think I'm doing? A good chunk of it is probably going to the landfill anyway. Beth shared with me some comments from a writer who calls himself "Radical Garbageman" -- and works in the waste management industry:

Dirty little secret of waste management: Single stream recyclers often "inflate" the definitions of what is recyclable because it increases recovery rates of things that are really recyclable by making it easy.The first step is to then sort out the non-recyclables and landfill them.

I guess more is better than less. But it would be so much better if I knew what was actually going to be recycled. I've posted the Pasadena guidelines here before -- and they're not very specific. (Still waiting for a callback from the city's PR folks.)

Here's Radical Garbageman's response to those of us who feel somewhat betrayed by the knowledge that we're not necessarily the recycling paragons we thought we were:

1. Any material that isn't in the bin goes to the landfill anyway
2. "Contamination" increases costs to the taxpayer (both in sorting costs and in the potential spoiling of recyclables, e.g. newspaper contaminated with food products can't be used anymore)
3. Making the program easy increases compliance at the risk of increased contamination

What do you think?

Meanwhile... I was on the Marketplace Morning Report this AM, talking about the challenge results so far. Several listeners took me to task for buying boneless, skinless chicken breast in order to reduce what goes in the trash.

"All it does is upstream the waste disposal to a processing plant or her local grocery store." Well yes, and I said as much in an earlier blog posting. Hopefully my butcher does something useful (i.e. mass composting) with the detritus that I'm not able to deal with in my backyard.

It does, indeed, have to go somewhere and I assumed people would know that. But as part of the trash challenge, I was doing whatever I could to make it possible to carry that thing around for as long as I could stand it.

And here's a comment from listener Nancy Wygant in Philadelphia:

Individual changes will not be enough to restructure our entire economy from a model based on consuming the world's resources as fast as possible for the sake of short-term profit, to a model based on sustainable stewardship of resources to meet real needs. But individual changes are where we each have to start. A radio show like yours could help by giving us better information and perspective on the real larger implications of our choices.

Again, that's the point of this whole exercise and certainly will be the point of the Consumed series in November. Probably the most frustrating part of this entire challenge has been that there's quite a bit that's generally out of my control, including packaging, recycling rules, and the space available for compost bins in my backyard. And unless you make change easy for the mass population, most people aren't going to make the effort.

And let's end on a positive note from listener Rebecca Roberts in Lincoln, Nebraska. She pointed me to an art installation in New Hampshire. This guy photographed all his trash for a year!

Maybe I'll put a hidden camera in my garbage disposal...

ADDENDUM:
My Marketplace Money colleague Stephen Hoffman, who so kindly came up with some earlier nicknames for me (see previous postings) has just coined a new one:

Less Mess Vigeland

Another small victory.

09/26/07 by Tess Vigeland

Comments (4)

Doug Corcoran | September 26, 2007 9:39 PM PT

Alas, I had to end my trash challenge a couple of days ago. The left-overs that went bad in our refrigerator went worse in my trash challenge carry bag. So, I had to stop taking the bags into the office with me. Another day and more ripening led me to move the bag from inside the cab of my truck to the bed of the truck. Then it rained. I kept it with me for a couple more day, but finally I had to face facts. I put the bag in my cart and wheeled it to the curb yesterday.

I am still impressed with the amount of trash that my wife and I generated. Although nearly two weeks made up about 1 1/2 bags worth, loosely placed, it still seems like a lot of stuff to throw away.

After we consumers have finished with something, we have some choices for what happens to it next. We can throw everything into the trash- not a good idea. Or, we can send things to the recycler, composter, etc.

The thing is, what can be recycled or composted is often determined by the local permitting and regulatory restraints, as well as basic market realities. I read in one of the other posts that some places provide for food composting along with the yardwaste and greenwaste. In Southern California, we do not have that option currently. There are no permitted facilities within a reasonable trucking distance.

As far as foodwaste is concerned, compared to So. Ca. the Bay area and some cities in the Pacific Northwest might be ahead of us. The main reason for that is economics. In So.Ca. the LA County Sanitation Districts have traditionally set the market rates for disposal very low compared to many other areas of the country. I noticed, Tess, that you visited Scholl Canyon Landfill. That is one of the San District's sites. Their stated mission for years has been to ensure that local disposal prices remained low. Consequently, many of the alternatives to simple landfilling were not competitive and failed as going enterprises, or never received the financing necessary to open in the first place. Conversely, in the Bay area and points further north, disposal pricing has increased substantially for years. Their average price for disposal is, perhaps, twice what ours in So. Ca. is. The economics up north became such that alternative methods for handling wastes could and do compete.

At last, the trend here is toward higher disposal costs. Furthermore, there is a serious push to explore alternatives that would replace or supplement landfills. Things are going to get very interesting in my business over the next five to seven years.

I hope the trash challenge was fun for others. It was for me.

Doug Corcoran

Beth Terry | September 27, 2007 12:20 AM PT

Hey, congratulations on the empty bag!

Hm... I'm not so sure if I sent you my black plastic it really would get recycled. I have a feeling your city might be using the strategy that Radical Garbageman talked about, taking everything and landfilling whatever they can't use.

But maybe I'm wrong! We can hope.

As far as other people's food waste goes, I'm already carrying home my co-workers' coffee grounds and tea bags and fruit/veg peelings. They think I'm really weird. But I'm not the one carrying around a chicken carcass!

Cheers!

Concetta Eckel | September 27, 2007 7:02 AM PT

Dear Tess,

I commend you for taking on this challenge. I do believe that we can make a difference one household at a time.

I have a suggestion for any bones or stinky stuff. I live in a rural area where we take our garbage/household trash to the dump. I collect my bones and store in the freezer until I take it. The attendant really appreciates me especially in the summer when he has to smell all our garbage. Other things I do to cut down on garbage is to compost all organic matter including coffee grounds to be used in my garden once composted. I take my canvas bags shopping when I go to the grocery store. I recycle all that can be recycled by presorting newspapers, magazine, cardboard, glass, metal containers and plastic which has to be further presorted. By doing all of this, our family takes one kitchen garbage sack to the dump a week.

If we could only get our grocery stores and businesses like Costco to take up the challenge. I have asked Costco to give us the opportunity to recycle the plastic container instead of me having to hold onto these containers for three months which is how often our city recycles plastics. I do take my own boxes when I shop there. They claim they do take recycling in certain cities. Better yet, why not discontinue packaging in plastic containers altogether.

I love your program. The format makes it fun and entertaining while providing lots of valuable information. In this case, perhaps it will get all of us thinking of contributing a better earth as well to our retirement.

Radical Garbage Man | September 27, 2007 2:00 PM PT

Regarding the now nationally famous chicken carcass:

Has no one else ever heard of broth?
One, it's delicious.
Two, it's cost effective.
Three, it reduces the volume and mass of food waste.
Four, if you absolutely insist on dragging the bones around with you, they won't smell so bad.

Post a comment


Sign up here to join Tess' Trash Challenge.

Rules of the Trash Challenge:

  • No kitty or doggie poo (it's a health risk)
  • No carrying into restaurants or malls where I could get kicked out
  • Really smelly stuff goes inside extra Ziplocs
  • If it's recyclable, you don't have to carry it around
  • Trash from work is included, as is trash from the rest of your household (i.e. if your honey tosses it at home, it goes with you...)

Latest Comments

Trash Challenge: Into the Dustbin of History (9)
Richard Oppenheimer wrote: In the week or so since you aired this piece, I began paying... read
Lisa Taber wrote: Wow, I'm psyched to discover Tess' Trash Challenge and the a... read
T-minus 2 (2)
Radical Garbage Man wrote: Tess wrote: There just are things that have to go to lan... read
Darryl Wingard wrote: This whole exercise has got me to thinking back on an old th... read
Trash Vigeland and Her Rat Posse (4)
Patricia wrote: You're right. You don't want those nasty chemicals in your ... read
charlene jaszewski wrote: rick has a great idea.., but realistically, if you did somet... read
My Bag, BFF for Another Week... (13)
Maryann wrote: Hazel, you should check out WrapSacks.com. My daughter's Mo... read
Nancy wrote: I have 2 son's that are plumber's and they have passed on in... read
The Good, the Bad and the Stinky (32)
Bruce wrote: I'm sorry, what's the point? This "experiment" is an attemp... read
Patricia wrote: Medical waste is a huge issue that I haven't seen addressed ... read
 ©2007 American Public Media