"Not a car guy" to run GM
After just a few months on the job, GM CEO Fritz Henderson resigned today. It’s not clear why. We just know he’ll be replaced by a man who has repeatedly said that he is not a car guy.
That would be GM’s board chairman and former AT&T leader Ed Whitacre Jr. Some clues about the change from the Detroit Free Press:
Whitacre and Henderson seemed to clash since the first board meeting in August. The Whitacre-led board un-did a deal to sell GM’s Opel division, a deal put together under Henderson’s watch. Whitacre has also made public comments that have seemed to run contradictory to what Henderson’s plans for the future entailed…
The announcement came on a day when GM announced its fourth month of year-over-year sales declines since emerging from bankruptcy. October was the first time GM had seen a sales increase over the previous year in 21 months.
In addition to Opel, several other high profile business deals have fallen through in recent months. GM’s deal to sell Saturn to Penske Automotive Group fell apart at the last minute. A deal to sell Saab fell apart last week.
Read more on today’s car sales numbers.
I watched the GM press conference on Henderson’s resignation. Not much to see. Whitacre basically said: It’s been a long day. I won’t be taking questions, but I’ll make myself available in the next few days.
He’ll have a lot of questions to answer. A spokesman said GM would be launching a national search for Henderson’s permanent replacement, but for now, Whitacre will take the reigns.
When Henderson replaced Rick Wagoner in March, The Financial Times wrote:
Although Mr Henderson is a down-to-earth and likeable character, he has always seemed a mite tougher than Mr Wagoner in his approach to restructuring, and more eager to challenge GM’s orthodoxies and its entrenched interests, notably its unions and its dealers.
That said, the question is whether GM needs another veteran of Detroit, steeped in its peculiar rituals and understandings, to dig it out of a very deep hole.
In fact, the board had been encouraging Henderson to hire executives from outside of GM, and Whitacre was installed by the Treasury Department as chairman. As for the government’s role in this?
The board made this decision and notified the Treasury Department — which holds a 61 percent majority stake in GM — but the government had no role in the decision, said GM spokesman Chris Preuss and the Obama administration. “This decision was made by the board of directors alone. The administration was not involved in the decision,” the White House said.
From what I’ve read, Whitacre is determined to change GM’s culture, so perhaps this shakeup will wind up being a positive move.
- Dec 1, 2009 2:11 PM — Scott Jagow
- 4 comments
About Scott Jagow and Scratch Pad
Latest Posts
- 189 days till the World Cup!
- The FCC wants answers from Verizon
- Wall Street tax still in play
- Morning Reading
- Bank of America's claws
- Congress tussles with the Fed chairman
- News and sales get together
- What to do about jobs
- Morning Reading
- It's basically somewhat generally better
- The dollar as art
- Dear Rupert Murdoch,
- Morning Reading
- "Not a car guy" to run GM
- Goodbye, Dubai?
Archives
sponsor
Scott's favorite spots
- 24/7 Wall Street
- BailoutSleuth
- The Big Picture
- Businessweek/Michael Mandel
- Cafehayek
- Calculated Risk
- Carpe Diem
- Clusterstock
- Crossing Wall Street
- DealBook
- Dealbreaker
- Econlog
- Economist
- Economist's View
- Felix Salmon
- Footnoted
- FT Alphaville
- Greg Mankiw
- Growthology
- Infectious Greed
- Knowledge Problem
- LittleSis
- Marginal Revolution
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
- The Money Blogs
- Naked Capitalism
- Paul Krugman
- Planet Money
- Real Clear Markets
- Seeking Alpha
- Silicon Alley Insider
- Sramana Mitra
- True/Slant
- Unemploymentality
- WSJ/Marketbeat




Comments (4)
December 2, 2009 6:56 AM PT
I’m not sure what they mean by “a car guy.” It seems to me that most of GM’s CEOs have NOT been “car guys.” Rather they’ve all been bean counters.
What they need to hire is “not a bean counter”
December 2, 2009 7:42 AM PT
Reports mentioned that the Government, with its 60% stake in the Company, had nothing to do with this management decision. While this may reassure some, us taxpayer’s should be upset. Taxpayer’s own 60% of GM and we had no say in this decision? Who did? Is the 40% telling the 60% what to do? What a waste of taxpayer money to prop up this Company if taxpayer representatives are not clued in vital management decisions. Just give them the money and let them run.
December 2, 2009 9:04 AM PT
Our government obviously view Government Motors as a sunk cost. The ship has left the surface so does it really matter which captain goes down with it? I don’t really know whether to laugh or cry as we are hoist/or sunk by our own petard.
joey: responding to Manuel Mihalas | RespondDecember 2, 2009 12:16 PM PT
Taxpayers don’t have a say because there are far too many people who don’t pay taxes electing our government leaders who have at best enabled, at worst caused, the current situation to come about.