Some props to Ford
Ford Motor Company deserves a little blog time today. Ford surprised just about everyone with a third quarter profit of a billion dollars. Most analysts were predicting a loss. This doesn’t mean Ford has solved all of its problems, but the company’s turnaround is impressive.
After closing more than 10 plants and slashing 45% of its workforce since 2006 in its long-ailing North American division, the Dearborn-based automaker today reported net income of $997 million, or 29 cents per share, compared with a net loss of $161 million, or 7 cents per share, a year ago.
For the first nine months of the year, Ford has now posted a $1.8-billion profit. That’s a $10.6-billion improvement from the same period a year ago.
Even the company’s long-struggling North American division reported a pretax operating profit of $357 million — its first profitable quarter since the first quarter of 2005.
I just had a chat with our New York reporter Alisa Roth. She covers the auto industry for us, and she’s working up a story on Ford for tonight’s Marketplace. Alisa attributes most of Ford’s success to “right-sizing”. Ford’s old business model was to build far more cars than it could sell. But all the cutting mentioned above has gotten Ford to a point where its inventory more closely matches its sales.
Because it doesn’t have tons of extra cars, Ford doesn’t have to rely on deep discounts which cut into margins. So, the company’s pricing structure is better. More from Bloomberg:
“Ford is a company that’s well into a turnaround,” said Bernie McGinn, president of McGinn Investment Management of Alexandria, Virginia, which owns about 320,000 Ford shares. “They did it by themselves and didn’t take government money. That gives people a good gut feeling and they’re being rewarded for that.”
But before we give Ford the Nobel Peace Prize, there are some issues. For one thing, CEO Alan Mulally chose to skip over 2010 and say that Ford would be solidly profitable in 2011. Why did he ignore 2010? Well, he’s not sure what the economy will offer up. Ford is profitable right now with car sales at their current levels. To be sure, those levels were boosted by cash-for-clunkers. Who knows what sales will be like next year?
The second issue for Ford is debt. It still has $23 billion in long-term debt. Alisa says that number probably needs to come down at least another $3 billion. Otherwise, Ford’s access to credit is tricky and puts it at a disadvantage with GM and Chrysler. Those two don’t have much debt because it was wiped out in their bankruptcies.
And finally, from Businessweek:
Of the company’s $1.1 billion pretax profit, $677 million came from the finance company. Relying heavily on finance profits has long been a crutch of U.S. automakers since profits on their cars were hard to come by.
Just being in the black in today’s recession is a big achievement, of course.
Even more so, considering the taxpayers didn’t have to get involved.
- Nov 2, 2009 12:25 PM — Scott Jagow
- 10 comments
About Scott Jagow and Scratch Pad
Latest Posts
- Buffett's new train set
- You be a good boy, Johnny
- Morning Reading
- Some props to Ford
- Cleaning the office coffee pots
- Bank failures are piling up
- How Goldman beat the housing market
- Morning Reading
- The bottom of everything
- The race is on
- The new Treasury Secretary
- Morning Reading
- Oh, we may be weary
- Checking out at Wal-Mart
- Jukes and head fakes
Archives
sponsor
Scott's favorite spots
- 24/7 Wall Street
- BailoutSleuth
- The Big Picture
- Businessweek/Michael Mandel
- Cafehayek
- Calculated Risk
- Carpe Diem
- Clusterstock
- Crossing Wall Street
- DealBook
- Dealbreaker
- Econlog
- Economist
- Economist's View
- Felix Salmon
- Footnoted
- FT Alphaville
- Greg Mankiw
- Growthology
- Infectious Greed
- Knowledge Problem
- LittleSis
- Marginal Revolution
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
- The Money Blogs
- Naked Capitalism
- Paul Krugman
- Planet Money
- Real Clear Markets
- Seeking Alpha
- Silicon Alley Insider
- Sramana Mitra
- True/Slant
- Unemploymentality
- WSJ/Marketbeat




Comments (10)
November 3, 2009 5:12 AM PT
Meanwhile, the all the UAW members want to become government employees of Government Motors and so they are doing everything they can to devour the hand that feeds them.
November 3, 2009 5:26 AM PT
Why can’t we just look at Ford for a moment and say something nice? Instead you twist this back to poke at the unions. I’m not a union guy but I have family who are and they are not the leaches you right-wing nuts jobs make them out to be.
November 3, 2009 7:58 AM PT
From: http://www.detnews.com/article/20091101/AUTO01/911010321/1148/Analysis++Rejection+of+Ford-UAW+deal+spells+trouble+for+region++industry
“…But voting results from locals nationwide make it clear the deal — meant to match concessions the union negotiated with General Motors Co. and Chrysler Group LLC during their recent, government-mandated bankruptcy reorganizations — failed to win approval from rank-and-file members by a wide margin.”
“That spells the end of the pattern bargaining system that has defined relations between the UAW and Detroit’s Big Three for decades. For the first time in recent memory, one company has been placed at a disadvantage to its cross-town rivals.”
How else to interpret this???
If the UAW sinks Ford then I’ll be deprived of a American cars as a choice. Do you want that?
November 3, 2009 6:59 AM PT
One of the reasons Ford made a profit was because the unions gave concessions.
November 3, 2009 8:06 AM PT
“One of the reasons Ford made a profit was because the unions gave concessions.”
How can you say that given the news out this week? Reality: One of the reasons that GM became “Government Motors” and Chrysler became “Crisisler” is because the unions enervated them!
JPM: responding to Ned D. | RespondNovember 3, 2009 9:53 AM PT
I didn’t see any major concessions. Not 1 billion dollar concessions at least.
Of course GM will do great. The government can push on Ford to get back the market share.
November 3, 2009 11:56 AM PT
I did. Here’s a WSJ story from last year:
“Ford and the UAW leadership agreed last month on restrictions on overtime and unemployment pay and cutbacks in work rules and cost-of-living wage increases, as well as the replacement of up to half of Ford’s cash obligation to its retiree health-care fund with company stock.
Ford officials expect the givebacks will SAVE THE CARMAKER BILLIONS OF DOLLARS and put it on the path to competitiveness with foreign-based auto makers that assemble cars in the U.S.”http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123662654608974841.html
November 3, 2009 7:01 AM PT
Ford is doing well but I think GM will do even better in the near future because they’ve shed a lot of legacy costs.
The government’s assessment this week that they will lose money on the GM and Chrysler bailouts did not include an analysis of GM in the absense of Chrysler. If I were the gvt. I’d hold on to GM stock for a while after the IPO and I think they’ll do just fine.
November 3, 2009 8:16 AM PT
“If I were the gvt. I’d hold on to GM stock for a while after the IPO and I think they’ll do just fine.”
If you are an American citizen, you are (of by and for) the government and you will hold on to GM stock forever as an endless liability, byword and monument to socialism. If you are a government leader and you choose to divest GM and then somehow it miraculously recovers, you will be blamed for throwing away the taxpayers investment! GM is a zombie albatross.
November 3, 2009 11:58 AM PT
Okay, that means I’ll get endless dividends, too.