Marketplace

Search

Damned if you do

Is it good news that worker productivity is way up? Should we be happy that companies are squeezing more out of their smaller staffs?

The Labor Department says non-farm productivity climbed 6.4% in the second quarter. That’s the biggest gain in six years. From USA Today:

The productivity number shows that companies have taken advantage of their slimmed-down workforces by wringing more out of each employee. That’s bad news for the jobless but should better position employers to hire again when demand returns, economists say.

So, this could be an encouraging sign that the drastic job-cutting is over, that companies are getting their strength back and will need to hire when demand returns. On the other hand, if you’re out of a job right now, it reads — they’re doing just fine with who they have.

Damned if you don’t

More bad news for the unemployed. There’ve been several stories lately about companies doing credit checks as part of the hiring process. From the New York Times:

…job counselors worry that the practice of shunning those with poor credit may be unfair and trap the unemployed — who may be battling foreclosure, living off credit cards and confronting personal bankruptcy — in a financial death spiral: the worse their debts, the harder it is to get a job to pay them off.

“How do you get out from under it?” asked Matthew W. Finkin, a law professor at the University of Illinois, who fears that the unemployed and debt-ridden could form a luckless class. “You can’t re-establish your credit if you can’t get a job, and you can’t get a job if you’ve got bad credit.”

Here’s how companies defend the practice, which is getting some attention in Congress:

“If I see too many negative things coming up on a credit check, it’s one of those things that raises a flag with me,” said Anita Orozco, director of human resources at Sonneborn, a petrochemical company based in Mahwah, N.J. She added that while bad credit alone would not be a reason to deny someone a job, it might reveal poor judgment.

“If you see a history of bad decision-making, you don’t want that decision-making overflowing into your organization,” she said.

NPR also has an interview today on this subject.

You might look at all of this and say there’s a weeding-out process going on in the workforce. I read a comment from one employer who said he cut 2 people from an 8 person staff and his numbers are up across the board. He figures those two people were dead weight.

At the same time, there are plenty of talented, hard-working people who can’t get back into the job market and might find it harder to do so with each passing day. I suppose the ethic of saving for a rainy day never sounded better.

Your thoughts?

Bookmark and Share

Comments (4)

Jose Velez | Respond
August 11, 2009 11:27 AM PT

This is a tricky subject. Both sides have compelling arguments. On one side you have serious concerns about the compounding effect this type of screening can have on workers. On the other you have businesses trying to find more effecient ways to bring on new talent while reducing the risk of adding a less than desirable employee.

This issue is definitely worth keeping tabs on.

Jose Velez: responding to Jose Velez | Respond
August 12, 2009 11:31 AM PT

This issue kept me pondering so I had to write a longer response. You can read it here

Tom Shillock | Respond
August 11, 2009 11:55 AM PT

One inescapable implication of the 6.4% jump in second quarter GDP amidst rising unemployment in an economy that is 70+% consumer driven is that what’s good for corporate America is not good for Americans. The number of people suffering salary reductions or forced unpaid absences helps the GDP number as well as decreased June wholesaler inventories. Cutting expenses faster than revenue drops creates the illusion of improving efficiency and productivity.

What’s needed is a real fiscal stimulus and economic policies that help average Americans not financial oligarchs. Rebuilding bank balance sheets at the expense of potential consumers is economically and socially counterproductive.

It’s discouraging that the guy we elected to change things for the better is behaving more like Bill Clinton than FDR.

JPM | Respond
August 11, 2009 12:50 PM PT

The U.S. Government also conducts background checks on possible employees. If you are in a “somewhat”/not really sensitive position, you can be denied for having poor credit because bad people could have financial power over you.

Post a comment

 


Comment preview will appear below.
If responding to another comment, your comment will appear below the original comment when it's published.

The following HTML tags are allowed in your comments:
+ Bold: <b>Text</b>
+ Italic: <i>Text</i>
+ Link: <a href="http://url" target="_blank">Link</a>


American Public Media © |   Terms and Conditions   |   Privacy Policy