Marketplace

Search

Airplanes going nowhere

This week, the Transportation Secretary said he was looking into a five hour tarmac delay in Rochester, Minnesota. His department’s trying to decide whether to make new rules about people being cooped up in grounded airplanes for hours at a time.

USA Today has a good piece on the issue:

About 200,000 domestic passengers have been stuck on more than 3,000 planes for three hours or more waiting to take off or taxi to a gate since January 2007, a USA TODAY analysis of U.S. Transportation Department data has found.

Between October of last year and the end of June, 855 flights have sat three hours or more. Although that’s a large number, the flights represent a small rate — about 1.8 in 10,000 flights.

But June was the worst month by far for tarmac delays. There were 278 flights that had tarmac waits of three hours or more. Here’s what the law says:

Federal aviation law gives pilots and the airlines sole authority to decide whether to keep passengers on planes or let them off, government officials and aviation legal experts say. Anyone trying to leave on their own could be cited for interfering with the duties of the flight crew and fined up to $25,000, says Alison Duquette, spokeswoman for the Federal Aviation Administration, the government agency that regulates air travel and safety.

But if you watch the video in the USA Today story, you have to wonder who the heck is actually in charge. A passenger shot the video while he was stuck on a plane at JFK two years ago:

After seeing fellow passengers leave their seats for fresh air at an open side door and a mother fan her baby with an emergency evacuation card, (David) Ollila took his video camera and recorded the pilot’s answers to his questions about why the plane couldn’t return to the terminal.

The pilot called police to remove Ollila. But Ollila says police and airport security officials agreed everyone should be allowed to get off.

Continental CEO Larry Kellner apologized in USA Today’s editorial section for the incident in Rochester:

We fully recognize that the outcome was unacceptable. Both Continental and ExpressJet will provide a full recap to the Department of Transportation.

While we believed our processes for managing these situations were effective, they clearly broke down in the handling of Continental Express Flight 2816. We are working hard to identify the problems and will continue to work to improve service to our customers in irregular operations.

Continental and its regional airline partners are highly focused on this issue, and we remain strongly committed to resolving it.

But there’s stirring in Congress about a Passenger Bill of Rights that would resolve this for the airlines. It might cap the amount of time passengers can sit in a plane that’s not moving:

“The inexcusable actions of Continental Airlines … makes clear, once again, the airline industry’s refusal to protect passenger rights,” says Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., a sponsor of the legislation.

The airlines, of course, oppose the bill:

“If you pass a law, you inevitably will end up with unintended consequences that may be worse than original problem,” says David Cush, CEO of Virgin America, which has a policy of returning delayed planes to terminals after four hours.

“We had a situation about a month ago at (New York’s JFK), where we had a plane sit out on the taxiway for four hours and 10 minutes,” Cush says. “We normally bring our planes back after four hours, unless we’re certain takeoff is imminent. Well, if we had had a four-hour law in place, that plane would have gone back to the terminal and then would have been 35th or 40th in line to take off. As it was, they got in the air 10 minutes later.”

There has to be some middle ground here. Air travel regulations and airline policies should be as stiff as possible to protect passengers, but when those policies, instead, endanger people’s health and sanity, they no longer make sense.

Just be sure you watch that video.

Bookmark and Share

Comments (3)

Benjamin | Respond
August 13, 2009 11:43 AM PT

Yet another reason that airlines rate poorly in customer satisfaction surveys.

I hate dealing with companies where my only discretion is to pay money and take all the grief, or not pay and do without the service; the amount of grief being the key portion of the equation. Airlines, phone companies, cable companies, and health insurers take my money and give me a service. But I know that at any time if something goes even slightly off the normal operation track, then it will be on me to put up with as much grief as they give because I am locked in and do not have any choice.

If I am locked on an airplane that will not move then what options do I have? Call for help? Cell phones not allowed? Give the stewardess or pilot a stern request for service? I get sent to jail - do not pass go - for disrupting the safety of the craft. Only one good option left: Sit there and suffer through it because I am locked and I have no choice.

I would love to make my voice heard with my dollars, but no airlines with good customer service records (Southwest) land at an airport within 100 miles of me.

The best solution I can come up with is to find a way to make it easier for more airlines to fly to more airports. Then competition would theoretically let the good companies rise and lead the bad to reform or fail. But as it is, the micro monopolies airlines have on smaller cities ensures bad service and continued consumer suffering.

JPM: responding to Benjamin | Respond
August 14, 2009 5:02 AM PT

This is what happens when the Government continually props up businesses. The airlines know that are a losing industry, but they can never lose. There should be competition, but air transportation just might be too expensive for everyone.

Jim Hayes | Respond
August 14, 2009 11:22 AM PT

Aren’t people on an airplane in a situation like this smart enough to pull out their cell phone and call 911? Seems like an emergency to me…..

Post a comment

 


Comment preview will appear below.
If responding to another comment, your comment will appear below the original comment when it's published.

The following HTML tags are allowed in your comments:
+ Bold: <b>Text</b>
+ Italic: <i>Text</i>
+ Link: <a href="http://url" target="_blank">Link</a>


American Public Media © |   Terms and Conditions   |   Privacy Policy