Housing hot potatoes
I thought one of the items from Morning Reading deserved a little more attention. You know how there was talk of homeowners just walking away from their mortgages, and then getting foreclosed upon? Well, apparently, banks are now walking away from the foreclosures.
The Cleveland Plain-Dealer cites several examples, including that of Shawn Martin:
Shawn Martin doesn’t know what will happen to his property on Reno Avenue in Cleveland, where a foreclosure was filed on the two-family rental house in 2006.
The sheriff sale had been scheduled, and Martin figured his lender took possession after he drove by and saw the windows boarded up and a tarp on the roof. But nobody bought it — not even his mortgage company.
“They backed out on it and just left it without even telling me,” Martin said. “It just sat there and decayed without me even knowing about it.”
The house has been demolished and Martin is worried about being stuck with the bill.
“This is a nightmare,” he said.
When a bank backs out of a foreclosure, the deed remains in the original owner’s name, which means they’re responsible for upkeep, back taxes, etc. Here’s another example:
Renetta Atterberry thought she had lost her East 102nd Street house. So she was shocked to learn in January — five years after her mortgage company filed for foreclosure — that it was still in her name.
Worse, the long-vacant rental home had been vandalized and she faced a raft of housing code violations. Since then, she has been saddled with debts of about $12,000 to pay for demolition and back taxes.
“I thought I had nothing else to do with that home,” said Atterberry. “I was so embarrassed and humiliated by this.”
Her mortgage company didn’t buy the house and never took it to sheriff’s sale to see if somebody else would, leaving Atterberry the legal owner, responsible for upkeep and taxes.
An Ohio state lawmaker is drafting a bill that would require lenders to take foreclosed properties to a sheriff sale within a certain period of time. In the meantime, these bank walkaways are only adding to the foreclosure blight on many neighborhoods across the country. Just wait until the empty strip shopping malls that mortgage-holders and banks decide to abandon start decaying. It’s not a pretty picture.
- Jul 20, 2009 9:19 AM — Scott Jagow
- 6 comments
About Scott Jagow and Scratch Pad
Latest Posts
- Chart of the Day
- Airplanes going nowhere
- Morning Reading
- Deep thoughts, by Chuck Lorre
- I want you back
- The bottled water scam
- Morning Reading
- Pin the tail on the lobbyist
- Tied up in knots
- Damned if you do
- Morning Reading
- From totally chic to totally geek
- Crackberry overtime
- Swimming with sharks
- Wine, women and the economy
sponsor
Scott's favorite spots
- 24/7 Wall Street
- BailoutSleuth
- The Big Picture
- Businessweek/Michael Mandel
- Cafehayek
- Calculated Risk
- Carpe Diem
- Clusterstock
- Crossing Wall Street
- DealBook
- Dealbreaker
- Econlog
- Economist
- Economist's View
- Felix Salmon
- Footnoted
- FT Alphaville
- Greg Mankiw
- Growthology
- Infectious Greed
- Knowledge Problem
- LittleSis
- Marginal Revolution
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
- The Money Blogs
- Naked Capitalism
- Paul Krugman
- Planet Money
- Real Clear Markets
- Seeking Alpha
- Silicon Alley Insider
- Sramana Mitra
- True/Slant
- Unemploymentality
- WSJ/Marketbeat




Comments (6)
July 20, 2009 12:23 PM PT
Interesting !! Question is - who owns the House in this case ? Does it mean that the Owner now owns the House Free & Clear ?
July 20, 2009 12:55 PM PT
Good question, Vivek. It appears, that in many cases, the owner still owes on the mortgage, since it was never actually foreclosed upon. Of course, these people aren’t going to pay because they didn’t have the money in the first place, and they still don’t. One woman wanted to donate her property to the county’s land bank, but they wouldn’t let her because there’s still a $48,000 lien on the house. It’s quite the mess.
July 20, 2009 2:45 PM PT
A home in SC had a $234 tax bill that went unpaid. So, the city sold the $160,000 property for $20,000 to a realtor. The realtor was upset that a car was still there so called the police to get whoever was in there out. They found the bodies of 72 year old Mary Sue Merchant and her dog, dead for over 18 months. No one bothered to check on her. The kicker is the realtor is now selling the home and acres for an outrageous price despite getting it for 1/8th the value (check it out on his website). That is greed incarnate.
Bulldoze the houses. Bulldoze the strip malls. I’d rather see greenspace than some realtor making profits like that.
July 21, 2009 12:30 PM PT
So there’s a stock of livable, empty houses growing around the country.
Presumably as unemployed and underemployed families become increasingly squeezed out of homes and rentals, they’ll begin to live in these empty homes and create an entirely new dweller class: squatters.
Are there laws about squatting? Were there ever, or are there now, ‘Squatter’s Rights’, or is that just a meaningless term? If you live there long enough and the legal owner by word or deed abandons the property, does it become yours?
July 21, 2009 5:10 PM PT
Two years ago, my buddy went to look at a “vacant” house in suburban Detroit and the realtor and him walked in and a family was eating dinner inside on the floor. The father started yelling and the realtor said, “We’ll leave.Calm down.”
There is even a wikihow page on how to squat!
July 22, 2009 5:48 AM PT
What a funny story! And how crazy!! I’m sure we’ll see a lot more of that before we see less.