Taxpayers aren't getting a "refund"
When you hear about banks like Goldman Sachs returning their TARP money, you might think that means the taxpayer is getting something like a refund. Or that those funds will go to reducing the government’s bailout debt. No. In fact, it may mean the government will spend more money.
Clusterstock explains it this way:
You see, returned TARP funds become part of the general revenue of the federal government. The money is treated just like money paid by taxpayers. It simply becomes part of the income of the government that will be spent by politicians and bureaucrats. There’s no lockbox or segregated fund. It works just like Social Security taxes: the income just gets spent for whatever the government decides to spent money on.
Not only that, but when banks pay back their money, that increases the amount available in the TARP fund. The $700 billion is the maximum amount that can be outstanding at any one time.
Right now about $134.5 billion remains out of the original $700 billion. When Goldman repays the its $10 billion TARP funding, that amount will grow to $144.5 billion.
Which means the government can give it to another bank (or insurance company).
It doesn’t go back to the taxpayer. Of course, you weren’t taxed in order to create the $700 billion either. Not yet anyway.
- Apr 15, 2009 11:25 AM — Scott Jagow
- 6 comments
About Scott Jagow and Scratch Pad
Latest Posts
- Chart of the Day
- Airplanes going nowhere
- Morning Reading
- Deep thoughts, by Chuck Lorre
- I want you back
- The bottled water scam
- Morning Reading
- Pin the tail on the lobbyist
- Tied up in knots
- Damned if you do
- Morning Reading
- From totally chic to totally geek
- Crackberry overtime
- Swimming with sharks
- Wine, women and the economy
sponsor
Scott's favorite spots
- 24/7 Wall Street
- BailoutSleuth
- The Big Picture
- Businessweek/Michael Mandel
- Cafehayek
- Calculated Risk
- Carpe Diem
- Clusterstock
- Crossing Wall Street
- DealBook
- Dealbreaker
- Econlog
- Economist
- Economist's View
- Felix Salmon
- Footnoted
- FT Alphaville
- Greg Mankiw
- Growthology
- Infectious Greed
- Knowledge Problem
- LittleSis
- Marginal Revolution
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
- The Money Blogs
- Naked Capitalism
- Paul Krugman
- Planet Money
- Real Clear Markets
- Seeking Alpha
- Silicon Alley Insider
- Sramana Mitra
- True/Slant
- Unemploymentality
- WSJ/Marketbeat




Comments (6)
April 15, 2009 12:37 PM PT
Isn’t there supposed to be a link here to the website listing those who are owed returns ans stimulus packages? What is it?
April 15, 2009 1:06 PM PT
The Link to Brad Sherman’s site regarding people who are owed taxes is what I was looking for also. Did I miss it? What is the address? Let me know. Thanks, Bob Mack
April 15, 2009 1:11 PM PT
Here’s the link to Sherman’s site:
http://www.house.gov/sherman/resources/tax.shtml
It only lists California residents, since he’s a California congressman.
April 15, 2009 2:22 PM PT
Please post a national website. I do not live in California.
April 15, 2009 2:45 PM PT
Elena, there isn’t one, as far as I know. This was just a California Congressman who provided this information on his own website, dug up by his own staff. Here’s the Marketplace story about it from this morning:
http://tinyurl.com/cdzfbg
April 15, 2009 6:09 PM PT
“Back Off” That was the response from someone at the American Enterprise Institute. In my mind it is an atrocity that argueably the most prestigious bank in the country, Goldman Sachs needed bailout money in the FIRST place! Greed, dishonesty, incompetence; call it what you like, these bums need to be regulated by the governemt until it is in the best interest of the taxpayers to do otherwise. Tough Sh…. Maybe AEI should back off, or get real!