Marketplace

Search

Sex, sex, tax, tax

Could there be two words in the English language that get attention more quickly than those? But this isn’t false advertising. I’m going to tell you about a tax on sex.

Tomorrow, Nevada’s state senate takes up a bill that would impose a $5 tax on sex acts by prostitutes. Senator Bob Coffin came up with the idea:

Coffin, the Democratic chairman of the Senate Taxation Committee, said the state is desperate for revenue and he “will go anywhere” to find it, including the state’s 25 legal brothels.

The Nevada Brothel Owners Association supports the tax, which Coffin estimated would raise at least $2 million a year. Part of the money would fund a counseling agency for sex workers.

So either the senator is suggesting that there are 16,000 sex acts per year per brothel (43 a day), or he’s expecting illegal prostitutes to also fill out a 1099.

No matter, the bill is unlikely to pass. Nevada’s governor opposes it because a tax on prostitution would mean admitting that prostitution is legal in parts of Nevada. The governor doesn’t want to do that.

If you’d like to read about how other cities and states are trying to boost their local economies without taxing sex, USA Today has a story on communities printing their own money:

The systems generally work like this: Businesses and individuals form a network to print currency. Shoppers buy it at a discount — say, 95 cents for $1 value — and spend the full value at stores that accept the currency.

Workers with dwindling wages are paying for groceries, yoga classes and fuel with Detroit Cheers, Ithaca Hours in New York, Plenty in North Carolina or BerkShares in Massachusetts.

Recession creativity. I like it.

Bookmark and Share

Comments (5)

miguel | Respond
April 6, 2009 3:56 PM PT

$5 doesn’t seem like a whole lot of money. If you are going to tax it… tax it for real!

Jackal | Respond
April 6, 2009 4:14 PM PT

Prostitution should be legal and taxed everywhere. It’s going to happen anyway. Let’s regulate it and share in the revenues. NV’s govenor is living in denial - too bad for NV.

Anonymous | Respond
April 6, 2009 4:33 PM PT

Wait, a movie ticket costs, what, $9? $5 as TAX on a sex act seems high….

Scott Jagow: responding to Anonymous | Respond
April 6, 2009 9:31 PM PT

I guess it depends on the price of the sex act, doesn’t it?

m garcia | Respond
April 6, 2009 5:55 PM PT

Three letter words,here’s one that goes well with sex tax,WOW.Can’t believe the Governor is concerned about Nevads image and the brothel owners support the tax.Any body Craigs list.

Post a comment

 


Comment preview will appear below.
If responding to another comment, your comment will appear below the original comment when it's published.

The following HTML tags are allowed in your comments:
+ Bold: <b>Text</b>
+ Italic: <i>Text</i>
+ Link: <a href="http://url" target="_blank">Link</a>


American Public Media © |   Terms and Conditions   |   Privacy Policy