Latest Posts
- Keeping your gig
- Devastating job losses
- Going Down Under
- Oil skids
- Preventing foreclosure
- Highland Fling
- Fewer jobs, fewer buyers
- Paulson's new plan
- Dubai Eight Months Later
- Show me the money...
- Pink slips
- Goldman Sachs as online bank
- GM vs. Toyota
- Showdown for the showroom
- Random recession note...
- In case you've been wondering...
- Two charts...
- How bad is it at General Motors?
- The Whiteboard: How credit cards become asset-backed bonds
- Just wait for the hearings on this...
- Here's why Paulson bailed on the TARP...
- How's it going at your workplace?
- If you've been wondering...
- I'm pretty sure this is bad...
- Well, THIS is interesting...
- You've been wondering how we're going to pay for the bailout?
- If you're keeping score
- Not so easy...
- Visual guide to the financial crisis
- German prudence great for rainy days
- Obama meant it about C02
- GM gets the 'Pelosi bump'
- Some good news in the fight against AIDS
- What's your workforce strategy?
- Google leaves Yahoo deal
- Winner gets a bad economy
- Dressing up for the crisis
- We're running up an 'eco debt,' too
- Bizarre HSBC bank ad
- Dow closes up nearly 900 points
- Show me the money
- Wait 'til Bernanke sees THIS!
- Most House members' campaign cash from outsiders
- Gold ain't glimmering
- Getting naked in short selling
- Strauss-Kahn apologizes to IMF for scandal
- A look inside Marketplace
- A spoonful of sugar...
- Stand Up and Face the Music
- What are we talking about?
- Morning reading...
- Oh, the irony...
- Take the money...
- The credit crisis as Antarctic expedition
- I thought this was great...
- You must be joking . . .
- Two useful nuggets and one shameless plug...
- Now, how to put this on the radio...
- Untangling credit default swaps
- Everybody's talking...
- Can he DO that?
- I.O.U.
- Chewing on the credit crisis
- The power of youth...
- How do you say 'too big to fail' in German?
- 'Twas the Night Before...
- Crisis explainer: Uncorking CDOs
- What would you ask if you had the chance?
- How did this happen?
- Don't look now...
- If you've got some spare time...
- Hitting Close to Home
- Show me the money
- Senate Bill...
- I know who'd pony up
- Think about this for a second...
- What's good for Warren Buffett...
- Raise your hand...
- Fundamentally speaking...
- Brackets for the meltdown office pool?
- Plenty of alternative ideas for getting out of this mess
- If at first...
- Revenge, rather than stopping the bleeding
- Goldman Sachs gets big boost from Buffett
- More victims of the Wall Street crisis
- What's your opinion on the bailout?
sponsor






Comments (5)
December 2, 2008 8:55 AM PT
I’ve never understood the role of Pontiac in GM’s lineup. Chevrolet occupies the value nitche, Buick is in the near luxury segment, while Cadillac is in the almost-there luxury catagory; where does Pontiac fit in?
When GM shut-down Oldsmobile, I thought they closed the wrong division. Olds occcupied a postion just below Buick, but with a sportier image. Pontiac’s role as the Performace Division ended in the late 1960’s and should have been shuttered then.
December 2, 2008 10:24 AM PT
Let’s see-
Nissan | Infiniti Toyota | Lexus Honda | Acura
It’s not that hard to have a standard and luxury brand. Heck, before 2005 Lexus didn’t even exist in Japan, and I still don’t think Infiniti does. Why? Because their consumers are smart enough to realize “a badge does not a car make.” The know an “Infiniti” is a nicely equipped Nissan, a Lexus is a pretty Toyota.
Please explain the difference between a Chevy Tahoe and a GMC Yukon? How bout the Suburban and Yukon XL? What about the Denali models? Oh I get it, it’s the luxury version from the budget name with options and prices that rival the Cadillac brand for the same SUV. Clear as mud.
December 2, 2008 4:56 PM PT
Let’s see, Toyota has the Camry and Solara on the same chassis (saving money)
GM has: Impala, CTS?, Lucerne? possibly sharing common parts. OK, maybe not totally correct, but you get my point. (trying) to save money.
If they can change a headlight here, fender there, and have a new line. More power to them.
The scary part is if we shake up that corporation because they can create innovative products, what about the rest of the larger corporations in America?
December 2, 2008 6:44 PM PT
In 1994 GM bought SAAB. At that time SAAB was one of the foremost R&D companies developing powerful low emissions engines. Sadly, instead of embracing this progress, GM shelved all of it. Then, in less than ten years, GM was passing off other brands as SAAB. What a sham. Just another case of the rebrand. GMs way of cutting cost. If they sell off SAAB, someone will get the future of car manufacturing if any designers and engineers are left.
December 2, 2008 10:38 PM PT
You did not show the profit or loss for each vehicle. If a car or truck is losing money, they should stop making it. Detroit has to downsize and only make vehicles that they can sell profitably.
If gas gets down to 99 cents per gallon, they can sell those high margin SUVs again.