Marketplace Off Air
Obama meant it about C02
And now, more damage for U.S. auto makers’ bottom lines. Bloomberg is reporting President-elect Obama is expected to grant California a waiver allowing regulations on greenhouse gas emissions tougher than those currently set in the U.S. This increases pressure on the auto industry to develop efficient vehicles, which will cost billions and restrict sales of currently-existing car models no longer compliant with new standards.
California wants to cut carbon exhaust and other gases that induce global warming 30 percent by 2016. More on the state’s efficiency initiatives in the LA Times.
- November 13, 2008 — Melissa Kaplan
- 2 comments
Latest Posts
- Keeping your gig
- Devastating job losses
- Going Down Under
- Oil skids
- Preventing foreclosure
- Highland Fling
- Fewer jobs, fewer buyers
- Paulson's new plan
- Dubai Eight Months Later
- Show me the money...
- Pink slips
- Goldman Sachs as online bank
- GM vs. Toyota
- Showdown for the showroom
- Random recession note...
- In case you've been wondering...
- Two charts...
- How bad is it at General Motors?
- The Whiteboard: How credit cards become asset-backed bonds
- Just wait for the hearings on this...
- Here's why Paulson bailed on the TARP...
- How's it going at your workplace?
- If you've been wondering...
- I'm pretty sure this is bad...
- Well, THIS is interesting...
- You've been wondering how we're going to pay for the bailout?
- If you're keeping score
- Not so easy...
- Visual guide to the financial crisis
- German prudence great for rainy days
- Obama meant it about C02
- GM gets the 'Pelosi bump'
- Some good news in the fight against AIDS
- What's your workforce strategy?
- Google leaves Yahoo deal
- Winner gets a bad economy
- Dressing up for the crisis
- We're running up an 'eco debt,' too
- Bizarre HSBC bank ad
- Dow closes up nearly 900 points
- Show me the money
- Wait 'til Bernanke sees THIS!
- Most House members' campaign cash from outsiders
- Gold ain't glimmering
- Getting naked in short selling
- Strauss-Kahn apologizes to IMF for scandal
- A look inside Marketplace
- A spoonful of sugar...
- Stand Up and Face the Music
- What are we talking about?
- Morning reading...
- Oh, the irony...
- Take the money...
- The credit crisis as Antarctic expedition
- I thought this was great...
- You must be joking . . .
- Two useful nuggets and one shameless plug...
- Now, how to put this on the radio...
- Untangling credit default swaps
- Everybody's talking...
- Can he DO that?
- I.O.U.
- Chewing on the credit crisis
- The power of youth...
- How do you say 'too big to fail' in German?
- 'Twas the Night Before...
- Crisis explainer: Uncorking CDOs
- What would you ask if you had the chance?
- How did this happen?
- Don't look now...
- If you've got some spare time...
- Hitting Close to Home
- Show me the money
- Senate Bill...
- I know who'd pony up
- Think about this for a second...
- What's good for Warren Buffett...
- Raise your hand...
- Fundamentally speaking...
- Brackets for the meltdown office pool?
- Plenty of alternative ideas for getting out of this mess
- If at first...
- Revenge, rather than stopping the bleeding
- Goldman Sachs gets big boost from Buffett
- More victims of the Wall Street crisis
- What's your opinion on the bailout?
sponsor






Comments (2)
November 13, 2008 1:10 PM PT
I say great! Let California continue to lead the way!!
November 17, 2008 4:48 PM PT
From the LA Times link
“Despite a difficult economy, it is important that we move forward,” Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger said, adding that the plan would result in “tens of thousands more jobs and a boost to California’s gross domestic production.”
Governor Schwarzenegger is calling for legislation which “would result in “billions of dollars of increased energy costs.” The group asserted that the plan would raise electricity rates by 11%, natural gas rates by 8% and gasoline costs by $11 billion a year.”
Governor Schwarzenegger and through his endorsement, President elect Obama, are asking for astonishingly painful environmentally driven economic changes during a global recession. GHG emissions, though laudable, do not seem to be a politically credible motive.
Given the financial ramifications of throttling the Californian economy for GHG reduction purposes alternative decision making terms like population build out, resource depletion, and available access to water and food come to mind.
What comes to yours?