Marketplace Off Air
Here's why Paulson bailed on the TARP...
…or at least the original version of it, that is, buying up troubled assets.
As part of the Citigroup bailout announced this morning, we learned Citi’s got at least 306 billion in toxic assets on the books. That’s practically half the whole thing right there.
He bailed because he knew 700 billion wasn’t going to be enough to cover everybody else.
- November 24, 2008 — Kai Ryssdal
- 6 comments
Latest Posts
- Keeping your gig
- Devastating job losses
- Going Down Under
- Oil skids
- Preventing foreclosure
- Highland Fling
- Fewer jobs, fewer buyers
- Paulson's new plan
- Dubai Eight Months Later
- Show me the money...
- Pink slips
- Goldman Sachs as online bank
- GM vs. Toyota
- Showdown for the showroom
- Random recession note...
- In case you've been wondering...
- Two charts...
- How bad is it at General Motors?
- The Whiteboard: How credit cards become asset-backed bonds
- Just wait for the hearings on this...
- Here's why Paulson bailed on the TARP...
- How's it going at your workplace?
- If you've been wondering...
- I'm pretty sure this is bad...
- Well, THIS is interesting...
- You've been wondering how we're going to pay for the bailout?
- If you're keeping score
- Not so easy...
- Visual guide to the financial crisis
- German prudence great for rainy days
- Obama meant it about C02
- GM gets the 'Pelosi bump'
- Some good news in the fight against AIDS
- What's your workforce strategy?
- Google leaves Yahoo deal
- Winner gets a bad economy
- Dressing up for the crisis
- We're running up an 'eco debt,' too
- Bizarre HSBC bank ad
- Dow closes up nearly 900 points
- Show me the money
- Wait 'til Bernanke sees THIS!
- Most House members' campaign cash from outsiders
- Gold ain't glimmering
- Getting naked in short selling
- Strauss-Kahn apologizes to IMF for scandal
- A look inside Marketplace
- A spoonful of sugar...
- Stand Up and Face the Music
- What are we talking about?
- Morning reading...
- Oh, the irony...
- Take the money...
- The credit crisis as Antarctic expedition
- I thought this was great...
- You must be joking . . .
- Two useful nuggets and one shameless plug...
- Now, how to put this on the radio...
- Untangling credit default swaps
- Everybody's talking...
- Can he DO that?
- I.O.U.
- Chewing on the credit crisis
- The power of youth...
- How do you say 'too big to fail' in German?
- 'Twas the Night Before...
- Crisis explainer: Uncorking CDOs
- What would you ask if you had the chance?
- How did this happen?
- Don't look now...
- If you've got some spare time...
- Hitting Close to Home
- Show me the money
- Senate Bill...
- I know who'd pony up
- Think about this for a second...
- What's good for Warren Buffett...
- Raise your hand...
- Fundamentally speaking...
- Brackets for the meltdown office pool?
- Plenty of alternative ideas for getting out of this mess
- If at first...
- Revenge, rather than stopping the bleeding
- Goldman Sachs gets big boost from Buffett
- More victims of the Wall Street crisis
- What's your opinion on the bailout?
sponsor






Comments (6)
November 24, 2008 8:10 AM PT
Isn’t it unfair that the treasury favors one bank over another. Why is only citibank rescued ? Why not others. Is it just because it is “too big” to fail.
November 24, 2008 8:21 AM PT
Citi is probably too big to fail but the people running it have to go. The organization can’t have a tax payor bail out and keep the same peeps running the show.
November 24, 2008 10:46 AM PT
Ditto to wonkguy. Has there been any one group in America for the past several years that has been more stupid on average than financial services sector management? I think not. The disaster we find ourselves in today is the result of poor judgement, short-sighted greed, and extraordinary aptitudes for self-delusion. Did everyone realy think that already ridiculously overinflated housing prices would keep climbing forever? And that the poor shlubs foolish enough to buy houses at these prices would actually be able to pay the mortgages? Thanks for screwing up America, boys. Find the exits, leave behind the golden parachutes, and go stew in your own disgrace for a few years.
November 24, 2008 2:27 PM PT
How many corporate jets do Citigroup and AIG have? And, why isn’t the same “jet” criteria being applied to them as it is to the auto industry? Are there different standards being applied to white vs. blue collar workers? Do people who shuffle paper and money deserve a bigger break than those who actually produce something useful? Or, is it because the auto guys only want a low interest loan, and not a blank check that congress is giving them a hard time? I just don’t understand the logic behind this, if there is any.
November 25, 2008 4:03 PM PT
I think if the current administration puts approximately 100 billion in solar heat and hot water . It will be a win win for all. The break even is 6-10 years. The government gets it money back eventually. It gets a better return than the Wall street fat cats can give.
The government also helps the public. Since the oil consumption reduces to almost 10% for the current need for heating homes and hot water. That money flows into the local economy. This creates alot of jobs. And can help pension funds make money too
Zino
December 1, 2008 12:19 PM PT
For another expression of puzzlement on TARP see this brief note on the Information Arbitrage site. http://www.informationarbitrage.com/2008/11/why-did-tarp-change-course.html