Marketplace Off Air
Stand Up and Face the Music
Chris Farrell and I had a lively discussion this morning about why bank CEOs haven’t taken responsibility for their role in this financial crisis or really been part of the solution. We’ve gotten a lot of emails asking, why haven’t we heard from them?
No one’s suggesting banks should shoulder all the blame. The Fed contributed by making borrowing too easy. Borrowers contributed by being reckless. The government pitched in with both a lack of oversight and bad regulation. But at least Ben Bernanke and Hank Paulson have shown some leadership. Whether you agree with their solutions or not, at least they’ve offered them.
Bank leaders did get together last week at the New York Stock Exchange and said things like: “people like us may not lift their heads above the parapet to give ideas for fear that their heads may be shot off.” That’s Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein, with one of the more cowardly excuses you’ll ever hear.
Maybe bankers are trying to protect the few shareholders they have left by not saying anything. But when taxpayers are on the hook saving their institutions, a little contriteness, a little proactivity might go a long way toward restoring faith in the industry. That could be a huge benefit when Congress starts tackling regulation.
Instead, the CEOs whine about needing more tax breaks and less regulation, and worst of all, about the need to protect their compensation. They’ve proven they didn’t deserve to be paid so well in the first place. And now their cowardly approach only shows the public that they deserve it even less.
- October 16, 2008 — Scott Jagow
- 5 comments
Latest Posts
- Keeping your gig
- Devastating job losses
- Going Down Under
- Oil skids
- Preventing foreclosure
- Highland Fling
- Fewer jobs, fewer buyers
- Paulson's new plan
- Dubai Eight Months Later
- Show me the money...
- Pink slips
- Goldman Sachs as online bank
- GM vs. Toyota
- Showdown for the showroom
- Random recession note...
- In case you've been wondering...
- Two charts...
- How bad is it at General Motors?
- The Whiteboard: How credit cards become asset-backed bonds
- Just wait for the hearings on this...
- Here's why Paulson bailed on the TARP...
- How's it going at your workplace?
- If you've been wondering...
- I'm pretty sure this is bad...
- Well, THIS is interesting...
- You've been wondering how we're going to pay for the bailout?
- If you're keeping score
- Not so easy...
- Visual guide to the financial crisis
- German prudence great for rainy days
- Obama meant it about C02
- GM gets the 'Pelosi bump'
- Some good news in the fight against AIDS
- What's your workforce strategy?
- Google leaves Yahoo deal
- Winner gets a bad economy
- Dressing up for the crisis
- We're running up an 'eco debt,' too
- Bizarre HSBC bank ad
- Dow closes up nearly 900 points
- Show me the money
- Wait 'til Bernanke sees THIS!
- Most House members' campaign cash from outsiders
- Gold ain't glimmering
- Getting naked in short selling
- Strauss-Kahn apologizes to IMF for scandal
- A look inside Marketplace
- A spoonful of sugar...
- Stand Up and Face the Music
- What are we talking about?
- Morning reading...
- Oh, the irony...
- Take the money...
- The credit crisis as Antarctic expedition
- I thought this was great...
- You must be joking . . .
- Two useful nuggets and one shameless plug...
- Now, how to put this on the radio...
- Untangling credit default swaps
- Everybody's talking...
- Can he DO that?
- I.O.U.
- Chewing on the credit crisis
- The power of youth...
- How do you say 'too big to fail' in German?
- 'Twas the Night Before...
- Crisis explainer: Uncorking CDOs
- What would you ask if you had the chance?
- How did this happen?
- Don't look now...
- If you've got some spare time...
- Hitting Close to Home
- Show me the money
- Senate Bill...
- I know who'd pony up
- Think about this for a second...
- What's good for Warren Buffett...
- Raise your hand...
- Fundamentally speaking...
- Brackets for the meltdown office pool?
- Plenty of alternative ideas for getting out of this mess
- If at first...
- Revenge, rather than stopping the bleeding
- Goldman Sachs gets big boost from Buffett
- More victims of the Wall Street crisis
- What's your opinion on the bailout?
sponsor






Comments (5)
October 16, 2008 8:47 AM PT
Regarding your relatively mild upbraiding of the banking CEOs, please remember to point out that there are many responsible, conservative (in the careful sense of that word), and accountable executives at the helm of well-run and stable financial companies; I am fortunate to be able to work for such an institution. I trust that the incompetent, greedy, galumphing behemoths that have had their way, without accountability or responsibility, will be able to develop the intelligence to learn the lessons of sound and prudent financial leadership from the men and women in these organizations.
October 17, 2008 1:29 PM PT
I disagree, I think that the profit motive trumps prudence in the financial markets as they operate now. Because bank presidents have a short term focus, and risky investments pay more short term, they will keep making this mistake over and over again. The lesson of the meltdown will wear off in a few years.
Huge leverage should always be banned. It was big driver of the problem in 1929, and it is a big driver of the problem now. We cannot ever permit huge leverage in any financial instrument. This implies no mortgages with less than 5% down. We cannot ever again claim with a straight face that certain financial markets don’t need regulation and won’t ever get bailed out. Reality intrudes. People will always seek the profitable way, the exciting new (deregulated) thing, and that’s OK, so long as that creativity is prevented from tricking consumers and the market as a whole.
October 17, 2008 1:31 PM PT
I’ve got a suggestion for avoiding future financial meltdowns like this one. I think the root cause was people not understanding the new financial instruments that have been created, the fancy mortgages, and things like credit default swaps. Any buyer of financial products ought to know what they are getting, but they didn’t because the instruments were complicated, new, and designed to make a profit for investment banks and others. I suggest that we cannot simply outlaw financial innovation, nor can we continue as we are with buyer beware taken to a crazy extreme. As a moderate middle ground let me propose that all new financial instruments be licensed. Some regulatory agency would have to look closely at something like a credit default swap before it can be sold, and decide it is actually similar to an insurance policy, and ought to be taxed and regulated as such. Perhaps there could be a disclosure requirement on all new financial instruments that boils down the expenses and the risk, much as there is for a traditional home mortgage. Exotic mortgages ought to look risky to the average buyer, when they are risky, and prudent people will then avoid them.
October 16, 2008 10:00 AM PT
I agree… completely! It is sad to see men who have been placed in the seat of power forget, as JFK once said, “That civility is not a sign of weakness, and sincerity is always subject to proof”. Leadership isn’t a matter of status, it is a matter of doing the right thing, not because someone is watching but because it is simply the right thing to do. I am glad there are still those who believe in this and are willing to step forth.
October 25, 2008 9:18 AM PT
So he’s in the castle while us plebes wait to take a shot? Nice.