• News/Talk
  • Music
  • Entertainment

Marketplace

Marketplace Off Air

Stand Up and Face the Music

Chris Farrell and I had a lively discussion this morning about why bank CEOs haven’t taken responsibility for their role in this financial crisis or really been part of the solution. We’ve gotten a lot of emails asking, why haven’t we heard from them?

No one’s suggesting banks should shoulder all the blame. The Fed contributed by making borrowing too easy. Borrowers contributed by being reckless. The government pitched in with both a lack of oversight and bad regulation. But at least Ben Bernanke and Hank Paulson have shown some leadership. Whether you agree with their solutions or not, at least they’ve offered them.

Bank leaders did get together last week at the New York Stock Exchange and said things like: “people like us may not lift their heads above the parapet to give ideas for fear that their heads may be shot off.” That’s Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein, with one of the more cowardly excuses you’ll ever hear.

Maybe bankers are trying to protect the few shareholders they have left by not saying anything. But when taxpayers are on the hook saving their institutions, a little contriteness, a little proactivity might go a long way toward restoring faith in the industry. That could be a huge benefit when Congress starts tackling regulation.

Instead, the CEOs whine about needing more tax breaks and less regulation, and worst of all, about the need to protect their compensation. They’ve proven they didn’t deserve to be paid so well in the first place. And now their cowardly approach only shows the public that they deserve it even less.

Comments (5)

Jennifer Davis | Respond
October 16, 2008 8:47 AM PT

Regarding your relatively mild upbraiding of the banking CEOs, please remember to point out that there are many responsible, conservative (in the careful sense of that word), and accountable executives at the helm of well-run and stable financial companies; I am fortunate to be able to work for such an institution. I trust that the incompetent, greedy, galumphing behemoths that have had their way, without accountability or responsibility, will be able to develop the intelligence to learn the lessons of sound and prudent financial leadership from the men and women in these organizations.

Susanna Gross: responding to Jennifer Davis | Respond
October 17, 2008 1:29 PM PT

I disagree, I think that the profit motive trumps prudence in the financial markets as they operate now. Because bank presidents have a short term focus, and risky investments pay more short term, they will keep making this mistake over and over again. The lesson of the meltdown will wear off in a few years.

  I've got a suggestion for avoiding future financial meltdowns like this one.  I think the root cause was people not understanding the new financial instruments that have been created, the fancy mortgages, and things like credit default swaps.  Any buyer of financial products ought to know what they are getting, but they didn't because the instruments were complicated, new, and designed to make a profit for investment banks and others.  I suggest that we cannot simply outlaw financial innovation, nor can we continue as we are with buyer beware taken to a crazy extreme. As a moderate middle ground let me propose that all new financial instruments be licensed.  Some regulatory agency would have to look closely at something like a credit default swap before it can be sold, and decide it is actually similar to an insurance policy, and ought to be taxed and regulated as such.  Perhaps there could be a disclosure requirement on all new financial instruments that boils down the expenses and the risk, much as there is for a traditional home mortgage.  Exotic mortgages ought to look risky to the average buyer, when they are risky, and prudent people will then avoid them.

Huge leverage should always be banned. It was big driver of the problem in 1929, and it is a big driver of the problem now. We cannot ever permit huge leverage in any financial instrument. This implies no mortgages with less than 5% down. We cannot ever again claim with a straight face that certain financial markets don’t need regulation and won’t ever get bailed out. Reality intrudes. People will always seek the profitable way, the exciting new (deregulated) thing, and that’s OK, so long as that creativity is prevented from tricking consumers and the market as a whole.

Susanna Gross: responding to Susanna Gross | Respond
October 17, 2008 1:31 PM PT

I’ve got a suggestion for avoiding future financial meltdowns like this one. I think the root cause was people not understanding the new financial instruments that have been created, the fancy mortgages, and things like credit default swaps. Any buyer of financial products ought to know what they are getting, but they didn’t because the instruments were complicated, new, and designed to make a profit for investment banks and others. I suggest that we cannot simply outlaw financial innovation, nor can we continue as we are with buyer beware taken to a crazy extreme. As a moderate middle ground let me propose that all new financial instruments be licensed. Some regulatory agency would have to look closely at something like a credit default swap before it can be sold, and decide it is actually similar to an insurance policy, and ought to be taxed and regulated as such. Perhaps there could be a disclosure requirement on all new financial instruments that boils down the expenses and the risk, much as there is for a traditional home mortgage. Exotic mortgages ought to look risky to the average buyer, when they are risky, and prudent people will then avoid them.

S.D. | Respond
October 16, 2008 10:00 AM PT

I agree… completely! It is sad to see men who have been placed in the seat of power forget, as JFK once said, “That civility is not a sign of weakness, and sincerity is always subject to proof”. Leadership isn’t a matter of status, it is a matter of doing the right thing, not because someone is watching but because it is simply the right thing to do. I am glad there are still those who believe in this and are willing to step forth.

LB | Respond
October 25, 2008 9:18 AM PT

So he’s in the castle while us plebes wait to take a shot? Nice.

Post a comment

 


Comment preview will appear below.
If responding to another comment, your comment will appear below the original comment when it's published.

The following HTML tags are allowed in your comments:
+ Bold: <b>Text</b>
+ Italic: <i>Text</i>
+ Link: <a href="http://url" target="_blank">Link</a>

Subscribe to RSS



Latest Posts

 ©2007 American Public Media