Marketplace

Search

Getting Personal

Mortgage rates

Question: According to the Market Gauges in today's New York Times, the federal funds interest rate has dropped from 4.25% to 0.25% in the past year. Yet the rate charged homeowners for a 15 year fixed mortgage has dropped only from 5.33% to 5.05% in the same period of time. I wonder whether such discrepancies are historically typical, and what might be the typical time lapse before the mortgage rate drops proportionately to a reduction in the rate that banks charge each other to borrow money. Alternatively, does the discrepancy reflect the reluctance of banks to loan despite their receiving the TARP funds? This is of practical interest because I am contemplating refinancing my home mortgage and wonder how advisable it is to wait, assuming mortgage rates are likely to drop further as the effects of reduction in the prime rate will eventually trickle down to benefit consumers. Eric, Amherst, MA

Answer: If history is any guide, mortgage rates should drop farther, even though they are already at their lowest level since Freddie Mac started publishing the data back in the early 1970s. For instance, as I am writing this the yield difference between a 30-year fixed rate mortgage and the 10-year Treasury bond is 3.11 percentage points. (The 10 year Treasury bond is the benchmark interest rate for pricing mortgages.) The quick rule of thumb is that gap is normally about 1.5 percentage points, suggesting that the yield on the 30-year should be 3.61%. That's way below the current rate of 5.27% on the 30 year fixed rate. The interest rate on the 15 year mortgage would be even lower, closer to 3% instead of its current 4.83%. (Rates have come down slightly since you emailed your question which accounts for the different interest rate figures.)

History is one reason to suspect mortgage rates could go lower. Emerging signs of deflation or falling prices is another. And the government appears eager for mortgage rates to head lower. It's a good way to support the housing market since lower rates encourage refinancing and new home buying.

That said, we're living through a period where common rules of thumb are suspect. What's more, the government's ability to manipulate long-term bond yields is limited. Investor wariness about securitized mortgages is hampering the market's recovery. Lenders are wary of anyone with less than a stellar credit score. The housing market continues to deteriorate. All these factors are keeping mortgage rates historically high relative to Treasury yields. There's also the risk that at some point all the money the government is pumping into the system will ignite inflation fears.

What's the homeowner to do? Think through the downside. What if you wait for lower rates, and mortgage yields go up instead? How much of a difference will that make to your household finances? In other words, does it pay for you to bet on lower rates because it doesn't matter much to your overall finances if rates stay where they are or go higher and you can't refinance? Or is there a wide enough gap between your existing mortgage and current mortgage rates to make a refinancing financially sensible? if that's the case, why not refinance even if you do miss bottom? These are the kinds of questions and scenarios I would run through, always with an eye toward protecting yourself agaisnt the downside.

12/31/08 by Chris Farrell

Comments (4)

Amit Jain | Respond
December 31, 2008 12:29 PM PT

Besides historical data, could you provide some reasons for the relation between the 10-Yr T-note to the 30-Yr Fixed Mortgage Rate?

Thanks. Amit.

Ben | Respond
January 2, 2009 8:04 AM PT

Thanks! This topic has been on my mind quite a lot lately. I've been trying to pick to pick th right moment to refinance from a 30 year fixed at 5.75% I started in 2005 to a 15 year fixed. Since I am not having trouble with Mortgage payments now, I think I'll wait a while and see how it goes.

Jana Fisher | Respond
January 2, 2009 10:21 AM PT

I just researched refinancing our %5.75 rate on our 30 year fixed. When a credit report was run my score was lower than my husbands. I was averaging 725 my husband was 740. They worked it so that my husband was on the title only due to his higher score we got a lower rate. We live in Washington State which is a 50/50 state in the event of divorce so the broker said I really wasn't loosing anything by not having my name on the title. My name has always been on the title of our homes for the past 25 years. This just doesn't sound right. Any comments?

karen Chethik | Respond
January 10, 2009 1:29 PM PT

Dear Jana,

This sort of happened me on our last refinance. I was just cosigner (cause my husband had most of income) and they left my name off of mortgage coupons. I couldn't get it corrected before the loan was sold, but I gave up when I checked with county, and found out we were still listed as co-owners of property. The latest loan just happens to be in his name. When I bought property, my mom cosigned, and when I got married 8 years later, and we refinanced, my mother had to sign a "quit-claim deed" to take her name off any ownership, and we refinanced in my husband and my name. I don't know the info regarding "title", I would check with your county... but I never signed a "quit claim deed" and once property is in your name (even partially), I believe you have to sign this deed to relinquish your ownership. But, I may be wrong. I think that loan is technically owed by my husband (although were married so it doesn't matter) but the house, owned by us, is collateral for the loan. The bank does not own the house, and if you're worried, check out other lenders. I've refinanced 5 times since 1990, and I have found that when they want your business, they will be competitive... Last refi was for 4.5% 15 year fixed, and we had 2 or 3 lenders that offered us the same deal. The one we went with turned out to be the worst...but I knew what I was doing. so I didn't let him sell me something else. If rates get down around 3% maybe we'll do it again, but has to be worth it. I hope this helps.

Search

Looking for guidance on your personal finances? I'm taking your questions and answering one here each day. Just click on the "Ask a question" link to tell me what's on your mind.

Chris Farrell Marketplace Money personal finance guru

Ask a question

Subscribe to RSS



Add this blog on your site

Archives

August 2009
S M T W T F S
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          

August 2009

July 2009

June 2009

May 2009

April 2009

March 2009

February 2009

January 2009

December 2008

November 2008

October 2008

September 2008

August 2008

July 2008

June 2008

May 2008

April 2008

March 2008

February 2008

January 2008

December 2007

Latest Comments

Tax-exempt bonds vs. taxable bonds (1)
Eric Vanhove wrote: So, if there are calculators on the net, why should we be reading your blog? Geez, give us the form... [read]
Buying a few shares (2)
Manuel Mihalas wrote: I would recommend you minimize your trading cost as much as possible. There are many low cost tradin... [read]
Bob wrote: I just enrolled my 17-year-old in a no-load Roth IRA that requires no minimum contribution. There a... [read]
CDs (2)
Mark wrote: According to this, you can withdraw all of your money penalty free after 6 days, and still get the i... [read]
mei wrote: Can’t state enough how important the sacrifices that go into wealth creation are. Curious if anyone... [read]
Home equity line of credit (3)
Bruce wrote: I disagree about using a credit card unless you plan to pay it off quickly. Especially with credit ... [read]
DJ wrote: Using a cc is not most sensible option. My financial "guru" would never recommend using a cc that yo... [read]
Variable annuity (1)
ann hancox wrote: I took Chris's advice and also agree, they are expensive and once fit my life style. I recently cas... [read]

American Public Media © |   Terms and Conditions   |   Privacy Policy