Getting Personal
Frontload 401(k) contributions?
Question: I am a married 31-year old. I am a corporate lawyer and my husband is an entrepreneur. I'm in the process of setting my 401(k) contributions for 2009. In the past, I've always contributed up to the annual limit (my employer does not match, but it does invest profit-sharing in my 401(k) account) spread out over the course of the year. This year, I'm considering front-loading my contributions so that my annual contribution of $16,500 is taken out of the first 8 or so paychecks of the year.
I'm considering this because (1) I'd like to take advantage of the market's current low prices; (2) we have enough in liquid assets that I can afford to take home a smaller paycheck for the first three or four months of the year; (3) I'd prefer to make the contribution while my job and income are stable -- who knows what could happen as the year progresses?
In addition, about half of my annual contribution will be in the form of a Roth 401(k), rather than a traditional pre-tax 401(k).
Are there any risks with this plan? Should I avoid frontloading my contributions? Emily, San Francisco, CA
Answer: I can't see anything wrong with what you want to do, but there is a trade-off. If you keep making the same contribution throughout the year, you're dollar cost averaging. That means you're putting the same amount of money into your 401(k) on a regular basis. The true advantage of dollar cost averaging isn't financial, bit psychological. Dollar cost averaging takes emotion --fear, greed, and panic--out of investing.
What you want to do is make a small bet by frontloading your contributions that the market is currently undervalued, and that you'll come out ahead compared to regular dollar cost averaging. I'm sympathetic to your point of view. If you're right, and the market does rebound over the course of next year, you'll come out ahead. If you're wrong, you'll be slightly worse off. That's the risk or trade-off.
There is a wonderful passage in Reminiscences of a Stock Operator written in 1923 by Edwin Lefevre. (It's a fictionalized biography of Jesse Livermore, the famed 19th century speculator.) Lefevre tells this story: Somebody asked Baron Rothschild, the great merchant banker, wasn't it difficult to make money on the Bourse (the French stock market)? The Baron replied that, "on the contrary, he thought it was very easy." "That is because you are so rich," objected the interviewer. "Not at all," said the Baron. "I have found an easy way and I stick to it. I simply cannot help making money. I will tell you my secret if you wish. It is this: I never buy at the bottom and I always sell too soon."
In a sense, whether you frontload your contributions or stick with the normal payment schedule, you're following Baron Rothschild dictum. Good luck.
Search
Looking for guidance on your personal finances? I'm taking your questions and answering one here each day. Just click on the "Ask a question" link to tell me what's on your mind.
Chris Farrell Marketplace Money personal finance guru

Categories
- Banking
- Books
- Budgeting
- Charitable giving
- Credit cards
- Credit counseling
- Credit report, credit score
- Debt
- Dollar exchange rate
- Economy
- Estate planning
- Financial planner
- Housing
- Insurance
- Investing
- Kids and money
- Mutual funds
- Other
- Paying for college
- Retirement
- Retirement savings
- 401k
- Bonds
- IRAs
- Money markets
- Mutual funds
- Savings
- Scams
- Social Security
- Taxes
- Vacation
- Work
- cars
- graduate school
Hot Topic
Latest Posts
Archives
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 |
sponsor
Latest Comments
- Tax-exempt bonds vs. taxable bonds (1)
- Eric Vanhove wrote: So, if there are calculators on the net, why should we be reading your blog? Geez, give us the form... [read]
- Buying a few shares (2)
- Manuel Mihalas wrote: I would recommend you minimize your trading cost as much as possible. There are many low cost tradin... [read]
- Bob wrote: I just enrolled my 17-year-old in a no-load Roth IRA that requires no minimum contribution. There a... [read]
- CDs (2)
- Mark wrote: According to this, you can withdraw all of your money penalty free after 6 days, and still get the i... [read]
- mei wrote: Can’t state enough how important the sacrifices that go into wealth creation are. Curious if anyone... [read]
- Home equity line of credit (3)
- Bruce wrote: I disagree about using a credit card unless you plan to pay it off quickly. Especially with credit ... [read]
- DJ wrote: Using a cc is not most sensible option. My financial "guru" would never recommend using a cc that yo... [read]
- Variable annuity (1)
- ann hancox wrote: I took Chris's advice and also agree, they are expensive and once fit my life style. I recently cas... [read]
sponsor



Comments (3)
December 3, 2008 11:29 AM PT
I'm in basically the same boat, but want to do dollar-cost-averaging since it's not clear how much fluctuation there will be in 2009. An idea that I've seen floated around is to do the frontload contribution into a money market or other low risk option in the 401(k), then manually reallocate from there throughout the year to get the averaging effect.
Just wanted to throw that out there. :)
December 3, 2008 11:33 AM PT
Even if you can afford frontloading contributions it may depend on your job situation. Consider the following scenarios:
1) If you are afraid that your company may be laying people off, you might consider frontloading to improve your chances of contributing the $16,500 maximum. For example, if you space contributions out evenly, but are laid off on June 30 and can't find another job until 2010, then that is $8,250 you'll never be able to contribute. It would have been better to accelerate your contributions to reach the maximum before the layoff.
2) If you are looking for another job and think you might get one within the year, Emily (in this case) may want to keep things spread out a bit. What if you get a new job in on July 1 with an employer that matches 50 percent? You wouldn't be able to contribute anymore to a 401 (k), since you reached your limit. However, if you spread it out evenly, you'd still have $8,250 to contribute for the year, on which your new employer would match $4,125.
JL
December 3, 2008 6:51 PM PT
You should also check to make sure that if you do such a scenario, you check your employer's contribution rules. Some employers will match only if there is an equivalent amount being deposited into a deferred compensation scheme each pay period. For example, the federal government's Thrift Savings Plan, the deferred compensation scheme for federal employees, only provides matching contributions for pay periods in which the employee makes contributions. These matching contributions are a function of how much of percentage of basic pay is contributed. Contributing no funds would result in no match, and thereby a serious disadvantage.