Sponsor
  • News/Talk
  • Music
  • Entertainment
Marketplace logo
Go to Marketplace Home PageGo to Marketplace Morning ReportGo to Marketplace PM editionGo to Marketplace Money
My Two Cents, by Chris Farrell

« The Geithner plan | Main | What inflation? »

The new face of poverty

Posted by Chris Farrell on Tuesday, March 24, 2009

In reporting on poverty in Memphis, Chicago and Muncie it struck me that there may be a change in the nature of poverty. It's striking how well understood is the message that the way to get ahead in society is to get a college education--community college, junior college, a public four year university degree. That's the good news. Take a look at the vast numbers of high school graduates that go on to higher education in the first year after graduation.

The bad news is how many people I've interviewed that went to a community college for a year, a year and a half, maybe 2 to 3 years at a public university, but never finished. They didn't get a degree. So, they didn't get any of the job or career benefits of higher education. Take a look at the numbers that don't graduate in 4 years (or even in 6) and don't complete community college.

What the low income students do get is student loans--lots of student loans (at least relative to income). And you can't discharge public or private student loans in bankruptcy. The student loan debt burden is real. All you then need to happen is a medical illness, a lay off, some sort of setback, and the person is back in poverty and the student loans simply make the situation worse.

In the 1990s and 2000s a consensus emerged that homeownership was the best anti-poverty program. Or at least it was an anti-poverty program that could garner bi-partisan support. And there were genuine gains made through homeownership. Problem is, the predatory lenders took advantage of the situation. I still think with more thoughtful regulation the abuses could have been minimized.

To some extent, we have an education boom going. It isn't a stupid idea. Education is the way out of poverty. Education pays. But the details of how that is accomplished matter a lot. We don't want a situation where low income students end up with lots of debt and no degree--the educational equivalent of equivalent creating subprime mortgage neighborhoods. Public policy needs to be aware of the debt dangers.

I'm going to look into this more closely. At this point it's a suspicion and a concern.


Comments (2)

I was wondering if anyone else noticed that poor people are often sold college as an experience, promised the American Dream through an educational loan. I have taught at a number of "Career Colleges" and I'm not sure that students know what they are getting. For example I'm not sure that students know that they understand the time to money ratio. That they can get Government loans for the length of their program and that is it. If they fail a class or quit school their money still gets used up and they have lost time. By the end of their education they don't have enough money to cover the time they have left.

Carter G. Woodson and Paulo Feire both talked about how education systems, when misused, create people who are worse off than if they had been educated. My Grandfather would say if you do not know how to do something than education was a waste. Some folks need to learn trades and get certifications.

Any noonday you watch any number of diploma mills flaunting there wears. Many people in poverty have bought the dream of college because our public schools teach that. Plumbers make great money, HVAC folks do very well and school communities don't push or talk about these as viable choices to all students including poor folks.

First of all, nice article Mr. Farrell. Second of all, may I make the suggestion, that pushing higher education (post high school) has been going on since the late 70's, and that the student loan industry has been changing since the early 80's, and it when through a dramatic change in the early 90's when congress had to deal with the ultra high default rates of the predatory proprietary trade schools of the 80's.

For years they have been selling us this dream. The dream of being able to do better than our parents. Well I am generation X, the one they said would NOT do as well as our parents. And I have 2 degrees. One is paid for, the other, is from one of those useless predatory trade schools. I should be making 30 an hour, but due to the economic conditions I make 14 and am thankful that I have a job. Yet it is not enough to pay rent, transportation and the basics.

And where we can post comments on stories like yours Mr. Farrell, I hear the same lame excuses by the industry protectors. "you signed for it," "the terms were clearly spelled out" (no they were not). "if I had to pay why should you get to discharge yours?".

The fact is, Student Loans are the only consumer good or service, in America, that has NO consumer protections. These basic standard consumer protections have been systematically eliminated by acts of congress for what rational reason is any ones guess.

The fact is, that Student loans have become the new tool of enslavement.

"Student loans are (now) the only form of consumer debt lacking standard consumer protections. In 1997, student loan companies such as Sallie Mae successfully lobbied Congress to amend the Higher Education Act (HEA) and remove consumer protections, making defaulted student loans among the most lucrative and easy debts to collect. The loan companies actually have a vested interest in debtors defaulting on their loans, and great leeway to collect on those loans.

In 1991, The US senate recognized a group of students as being victims of proprietary trade school victims, or victims of student loan farming, yet to date they have offered no relief for those students who found themselves with debts they could not pay. Senate report 102-58. After that, radical changes took place, in part, due to lobbying efforts of the loan providers, giving them unheard of powers and little or no oversight. Over time, this has created the most predatory and inequitable banking industry in American history.

There is absolutely NO legitimate public interest served by creating a caste of permanent indentured servants (slaves) who can never get out of debt, never invest in our communities, never have the kind of life this country has promised to those who do all the 'right things.'

Although it seems as if it crept up on us, student-loan indebtedness is not an accident but a policy. It is a bad policy, corrupting the goals of higher education. The world we inhabit is a good one if you are in the fortunate third without debt, but not nearly so good if you live under its weight. Student debt produces inequality and overtaxes our talent for short-term, private gain. As a policy, we can and should change it.

WWW.StudentLoanJustice.org is a good place to start looking for information on how students can become involved in our effort to restore basic standard consumer protections on all student loans, Past, Present and Future.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

 

 
 

Subscribe to RSS

Latest posts

What inflation?
 
The new face of poverty
 
The Geithner plan
 
Middletown, USA
 
A good move by the Fed
 
AIG rage and the economy
 
Good question
 
Good news on the poverty front
 
Stocks for the long run
 
Education and Healthcare
 

Topics


 

Latest comments from recent posts

The new face of poverty (2)
Mac Wildstar wrote: First of all, nice article Mr. Farrell. Second of all, may I... [read]

The Geithner plan (2)
Missi Randa wrote: Obama and Geithner Knew and Bonuses Flew. There are many rea... [read]

Rent-to-price ratio (2)
mschris wrote: As a first time home buyer, what criteria should I use in or... [read]

Job losses in perspective (1)
kenneth t. sever wrote: Chris, I don't see how the job picture can improve as... [read]

A Short Sale Warning (9)
CORINNA ANDRADE wrote: I LIVE IN CALIFORNIA,HAVE MY ONLY ONE HOME(I LIVE IN)IN SHOR... [read]


 

Archives

March 2009
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007

 

Appearances and Worthwhile Events

Policy and a Pint: Health Care Handcuffs
 
 
 

More From
Chris Farrell

Marketplace Money's Money Clip Video
 
How Alan Helped Ben (BusinessWeek.com)
 
 
 

Other Blogs

Andrew Tobias
 
Angry Bear
 
Becker-Posner Blog
 
Brad DeLong
 
Cafe Hayek
 
Calculated Risk
 
Econbrowser
 
Economics Unbound
 
Economists View
 
Financial Rounds
 
Finance Roundtable
 
Greg Mankiw's Blog
 
Hot Property
 
Marginal Revolution
 
New Economist
 
TaxProf Blog
 
The Big Picture
 
Vox Baby
 
 
 

Books by
Chris Farrell

Right on the Money!: Taking Control of Your Personal Finances
rightonthemoney_bookcover.gif

 
 
 
Deflation: What Happens When Prices Fall
deflation_bookcover.gif

 
 
 

Recommended Books

Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk
by Peter L. Bernstein

 
A Random Walk Down Wall Street
by Burton Malkiel

 
The Little Book of Common Sense Investing
by John Bogle

 
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits
by Phillip Fisher

 
The Intelligent Investor
by Benjamin Graham

 
More Than You Know: Finding Financial Wisdom in Unconventional Places
by Michael Mauboussin

 
Smart and Simple Financial Strategies for Busy People
by Jane Bryant Quinn

 
Stocks for the Long Run
by Jeremy Siegel

 
The Random Walk Guide to Investing: Ten Rules for Financial Success
by Burton Malkiel

 
The Only Investment Guide You'll Ever Need
by Andrew Tobias

 
Unconventional Success: A Fundamental Approach to Personal Investment
by David F. Swensen