Sponsor
  • News/Talk
  • Music
  • Entertainment
Marketplace logo
Go to Marketplace Home PageGo to Marketplace Morning ReportGo to Marketplace PM editionGo to Marketplace Money
My Two Cents, by Chris Farrell

« Third Bank of the United States? | Main | Presidential futures market after debate »

A turning point?

Posted by Chris Farrell on Wednesday, October 8, 2008

The news is gloomy, but I wonder if it adds up to a turning point in containing the global credit crunch. But this is only in the sense of preventing a systemic collapse and bringing liquidity back to the markets. The global recession will get worse.

First, central banks around the world are now truly coordinating their actions. Most importantly, the European Central Bank is acting in concert with its peers around the world rather than putting out increasingly other worldy statements about fears of inflation. Deflation is the far bigger risk today with asset prices imploding than inflation.

The bailout bill has been passed. The Fed and the Treasury are supporting both money market mutal funds and commercial paper.

An anecdote: A Hispanic immigrant family here in the Twin Cities bought a home a few years ago. Like many Hispanic families, soem family members are legal and some illegal. A few have returned to Mexico, and the remaining occupant coulnd't keep up the mortgage. She called the bank, apologized, and told them she couldn't keep making the payments. The bank said we'll work with you. She said, I really don't make enough to pay the mortgage. The bank's response: No, you don't understand. We want you to stay in the house. We will work out a deal. I think the bank's have finally figured out that foreclosed homes drive down home values, which leads to more foreclosed homes, which further drives down home values, and so on. It has taken too long but my guess is that a lot more will follow the lead of Bank of America and cut down the mortgage.

In a depressing story about the current state of the home market, the Wall Street Journal has this important statistic:

On a national basis, home prices peaked in mid-2006 after rising 86% since January 2000, according to the First American index. Since peaking, that index has fallen 13%.

The declines have made homes more affordable, bringing prices in many areas closer to their long-term relationship to incomes. In the second quarter, the median home price of about $203,000 was 1.9 times average pretax household income, according to Economy.com. That was close to 1.87 times income for 1985 through 2000, prior to the housing boom.

The housing market could start attracting buyers with numbers like that.

A financial crisis doesn't stop immediately. The recession will be deep and long, and the recovery anemic. But we may be at or near bottom when it comes to "the worst financial crisis since the great depression." Let's hope so.



Comments (1)

I have a few questions for you on what I find to be some perplexing issues. First and foremost, I do not understand why finance companies are not lending. It seems to me that lending is finance. If they are not lending then what function do they have? An investment bank, it would seem, invests in a variety of enterprises in expectation of a profitable return. They don’t make cars. They don’t make hamburgers. They don’t repair appliances or install plumbing. They take money in and lend it out. So if they were not lending money anyway then why would we miss them if they were gone? Why would we give them 700B to lend when we could lend it ourselves, pocket the return ourselves. I do not believe that these finance companies will continue not to lend. I have heard that people cannot buy cars because they cannot get financing. What are GMAC, Ford Motor Credit and Chrysler Acceptance Corp. going to do if they are not going to lend money for auto purchases? What part of those corporations doesn’t understand that they need to sell cars to make the whole thing work? Besides, there are still companies that will lend money. They may not have the size of resources of the Lehmans, J.P. Morgans, Barclays et.al. but they are not in trouble and they will lend money because it is their charter. They are non-profit credit associations also known as Credit Unions. It seems to me that we are being blackmailed into shelling out for these companies when we have other alternatives. That is my first issue.

My second issue is that I don’t understand where that money is coming from and where it is going. If the government is getting it by borrowing it from future revenues then the money is currently out in the market making revenue to pay off this loan in the future. If it is out in the market now, then it is or has recently been in and out of the coffers of these same companies as it transfers through the economy. So how does the economy benefit by taking money that these companies have already and giving it back to them? How does that increase liquidity in any way? How does any one believe that this plan is going to have any effect at all unless they can infuse actual “new funds” into the system? I do not follow any logic here. Is there any logic here?

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

 

 
 

Subscribe to RSS

Latest posts

Warren Buffett
 
Voted
 
Policy and a pint
 
Prediction markets, one last time
 
Stocks for the long run
 
Fleeing equity mutual funds
 
A sobering statistic
 
Nobel laureates and their money
 
Other post World War ll depressions
 
The election
 

Topics


 

Latest comments from recent posts

A sobering statistic (1)
Ray The Money Man wrote: Chris, I couldn't agree more. Maybe I am just old enough to ... [read]

Other post World War ll depressions (1)
hakiton wrote: In 1985 years - it is good year for traidings, ... [read]

The election (1)
Nigel Eccles wrote: It is in the news media's interest for it to be a close race... [read]

What caused the Great Depression? (1)
Greg Ransom wrote: De Long is lying about Hayek. Hayek never said "depressions... [read]

Third Bank of the United States? (2)
Gene wrote: Some have call a Third Bank of the United States a Marxist p... [read]


 

Archives

November 2008
S M T W T F S
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007

 

Appearances and Worthwhile Events

Policy and a Pint: Health Care Handcuffs
 
 
 

More From
Chris Farrell

Marketplace Money's Money Clip Video
 
How Alan Helped Ben (BusinessWeek.com)
 
 
 

Other Blogs

Andrew Tobias
 
Angry Bear
 
Becker-Posner Blog
 
Brad DeLong
 
Cafe Hayek
 
Calculated Risk
 
Econbrowser
 
Economics Unbound
 
Economists View
 
Financial Rounds
 
Finance Roundtable
 
Greg Mankiw's Blog
 
Hot Property
 
Marginal Revolution
 
New Economist
 
TaxProf Blog
 
The Big Picture
 
Vox Baby
 
 
 

Books by
Chris Farrell

Right on the Money!: Taking Control of Your Personal Finances
rightonthemoney_bookcover.gif

 
 
 
Deflation: What Happens When Prices Fall
deflation_bookcover.gif

 
 
 

Recommended Books

Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk
by Peter L. Bernstein

 
A Random Walk Down Wall Street
by Burton Malkiel

 
The Little Book of Common Sense Investing
by John Bogle

 
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits
by Phillip Fisher

 
The Intelligent Investor
by Benjamin Graham

 
More Than You Know: Finding Financial Wisdom in Unconventional Places
by Michael Mauboussin

 
Smart and Simple Financial Strategies for Busy People
by Jane Bryant Quinn

 
Stocks for the Long Run
by Jeremy Siegel

 
The Random Walk Guide to Investing: Ten Rules for Financial Success
by Burton Malkiel

 
The Only Investment Guide You'll Ever Need
by Andrew Tobias

 
Unconventional Success: A Fundamental Approach to Personal Investment
by David F. Swensen