
![]() |
||
|
|
![]() |
|

« Murdoch's bid for WSJ | Main | The High-Cost of High-Fee Mutual Fund Flops »
The implosion in the subprime mortagge market is a tragedy. It's terrible for those people that bought a piece of the American Dream with an opaque, complex, risk-laden, poorly understood mortgage products.
But it's also a tragedy because of a lost opportunity. The subprime mortgage market held out the genuine priomise that the potent combination of financial engineering and the capital markets could lead to greater wealth for deprived, hard-pressed communities. It's a case Michael Milken, the financial innovator behind the junk bond market, has been making for years. The evolution of the subprime market to Wall Street says Milken was on to something.
In his book "Who's Afraid of Adam Smith?" Peter Dougherty drew a bright line between Wall Street and Diamond Street. Wall Street is Manhattan's money bizarre on steriods. Diamond Street is a downtrodden neighborhood in North Philadelphia. Doughterty, a long-time economics editor, muses in his book about how Adam Smith would confront the dismaying contrast between the two places.
The tale of these two streets, one racing with fortune and possibilities, the other rife with desperation, would set Adam Smith's mind astir. In his characteristically philosophical way, he would worry first about Diamond Street. He would think about how to make every North Philadelphian a merchant, for in doing so he would provide the key not only to greater wealth for the unlucky and deprived, but also the basis for community--for enriched social capital and for greater democratic engagement. The key he would identify would be that of new ownership--of homes, of jobs and businesses, of financial assets.... Smith, in his economist's intellectual style, would set himself to figuring out how to harness the financial horsepower of Wall Street in the interest of Diamond. The disparity that seperates these streets, as if on two different plants, has challenged some clever economists to think, in Smithian style, of using the prosperity of Wall Street to power the returns of Diamond Street by turning the undeveloped assets of Diamond into potential profit for Wall.
The growth of the subprime market proves that the fundamental insight is right: The financial might of Wall Street can be harnessed to build assets for the poor. The problem with the subprime mortgage market is that no paid enough attention to the actual contracts being peddled, many of them fraudulent at worst and misleading at best. The neglect is coming home to roost.
I hope that the promise of subprime financial engineering isn't lost during the current backlash against subprime lenders. Where is Milken's successor? To be sure, Milken ended up spending some time for securities law violations. But the junk bond market he helped create has thrived in his absence. Who will be the junk bond king of Diamond Street?
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |


Comments (1)
A letter from a subprime borrower to Novastar Mortgage:Attn: Lance Anderson
Novastar Mortgage
8140 Ward Parkway
Kansas City, MO 64114
Dear Mr. Anderson,
I am writing as a borrower in good standing on my current mortgage loan with Novastar. At present, I am encumbered with an interest rate of 10.99% on a principal balance of $124,500, leaving me with a loan payment of $1184.23 per month not including annual property taxes of $3,067. While I am grateful for the chance of homeownership, I would love to create some stability with regard to lowering my monthly mortgage payments. This stability would create a domino-effect for the greater good whose echo will be heard with resounding clarity first and foremost by the principles and shareholders of Novastar Mortgage, and secondly by the City of Waterbury a/k/a ‘the brass city’ which is striving to once again serve as a haven for working class citizens in the state of Connecticut.
Sir, I understand that there is contempt for those who find themselves in this difficult situation and if I were in better financial stead I fear that I would share this contempt. However, each month I sacrifice and strive in every imaginable way to clear a proper path and good payment history with regard to all my creditors. Please also consider that my very first mortgage loan on this property was held by Accredited Home Lenders in California at an interest rate of 7.99%.
I have already submitted an application with NACA (Naca.com) in an effort to reduce my monthly payments to a more affordable rate. I would like to stay in Waterbury and make it my home. I do not wish to add undue burden to your company, but only ask that you review my payment history and propose a more affordable mortgage amount.
Posted by Linda | September 1, 2007 10:23 PM